repixelizer/docs/spec.md

Repixelizer Spec

Summary

Repixelizer is a Python tool with a CLI and web GUI for converting "fake pixel art" into true grid-aligned pixel art. The target use cases are single-image icons, emblems, logos, and simple sprites, especially images that already resemble pixel art but fail to obey a consistent pixel lattice.

The project exists because generated imagery often creates appealing pixel-like local patterns while violating the actual constraints of pixel art:

• inconsistent subpixel alignment
• locally plausible but globally incoherent clusters
• noisy highlights and outlines
• fake micro-detail that collapses when downsampled

Repixelizer treats this as lattice inference plus reconstruction rather than a resize problem.

Goals

• Recover an implied target pixel grid from a fake-pixel-art source image.
• Produce a true discrete-grid output image that looks authored, not merely resized.
• Preserve alpha, silhouette clarity, and strong interior structure.
• Support palette-free output by default, with optional palette-constrained modes.
• Provide diagnostics and baseline comparisons so results are inspectable and measurable.

Non-goals for v1

• full sprite-sheet or animation consistency
• manual painting or mask authoring as a required workflow
• a native desktop app
• generalized photo-to-pixel-art stylization
• a learned model trained on a large dataset

Primary users

• artists or developers trying to salvage generated fake pixel art
• tool builders experimenting with constrained repixelization
• game/UI developers creating icons, emblems, badges, and simple sprites

Input and output contract

Input

• one RGBA image file
• optional explicit target size override
• optional palette file
• optional diagnostics directory
• optional solver/device settings

Output

• one final RGBA PNG
• optional palette-constrained output behavior
• optional diagnostics bundle containing JSON and visual artifacts

Product behavior

Canonical mode

The canonical workflow should be fully automatic:

1. load the source image
2. infer lattice size
3. analyze source structure
4. run the phase-field reconstruction over the inferred lattice
5. project that result to a real pixel grid
6. clean up obvious discrete-grid artifacts
7. optionally quantize to a palette
8. write output and diagnostics

No manual masks or user-authored region hints are assumed in v1.

This is the canonical machine in the repo. Comparison mode just runs that same phase-field result next to the baselines.

CLI shape

Primary commands:

repixelize input.png --out output.png
repixelize compare input.png --out output.png

Supported flags:

• --target-size
• --palette
• --palette-mode off|fit|strict
• --diagnostics-dir
• --seed
• --steps
• --device cpu|cuda

Palette behavior

• off: produce unconstrained RGBA output
• fit: adapt to a useful palette derived from or compatible with the result
• strict: stay strictly inside a supplied palette

Palette constraints are optional because many generated fake-pixel-art images do not originate from a coherent palette.

Technical design

1. Lattice inference

The tool must estimate the resolution of the fake lattice being mimicked.

Requirements:

• search over candidate target sizes
• use canonical cell centers for each candidate
• score candidates using coherence-oriented metrics rather than reconstruction alone
• expose the top-ranked alternatives in diagnostics
• if --target-size is provided, skip size search

Scoring goals:

• low isolated-pixel rate
• high cluster continuity
• strong alpha-edge crispness
• straighter outlines
• lower local color chatter
• reasonable agreement with source-derived periodicity priors

2. Source analysis

The solver should derive automatic guidance from the image itself:

• edge map
• alpha-aware source structure

This guidance is used to preserve important boundaries while allowing smoother regions to settle into cleaner pixel clusters.

3. Phase-field optimization

The optimizer represents each output pixel by a base lattice center plus one learned displacement vector.

Requirements:

• operate in premultiplied RGBA space
• use PyTorch autograd
• optimize a displacement field initialized at zero from the inferred lattice
• preserve local adjacency instead of letting the sample field collapse or fold

Loss components should include:

• local coherence / solidity so samples settle inside fake-pixel interiors
• edge-aware smoothing so hard boundaries stay crisp
• anti-collapse spacing so neighboring cells do not stack onto the same source pixel
• bounded displacement so the field does not wander off into the weeds

4. Discrete projection and cleanup

After the phase-field stage, the result must be treated as a true pixel grid.

The discrete stage should:

• evaluate local neighborhoods
• remove orphan pixels where possible
• merge obvious micro-clusters
• reduce accidental highlight static
• avoid damaging strong guided boundaries

This stage is intentionally heuristic and local in v1.

5. Baselines and comparison mode

The project must ship comparison baselines:

• Lanczos downscale
• naive resize
• resize plus error diffusion

compare mode should run:

• the same phase-field pipeline
• all baselines
• metric collection
• a visual contact sheet

The project should treat these baselines as the minimum bar for usefulness.

Diagnostics

Diagnostics should be machine-readable and human-readable.

Required artifacts:

• run.json
• lattice-overlay.png
• comparison.png
• alpha-preview.png
• noise-heatmap.png

Compare mode should additionally write:

• compare.json
• compare.csv
• compare-sheet.png

Acceptance criteria

The tool is successful for v1 if it can:

• infer sensible target sizes on curated synthetic cases
• preserve transparency and silhouette quality
• produce outputs that are visibly more grid-coherent than simple resize baselines
• avoid obvious isolated-pixel explosions
• generate diagnostics that explain how and why a run behaved the way it did

Future expansion

The design should leave room for:

• manual region hints or lock zones
• multi-frame consistency for sprite sheets
• more advanced warping or lattice-field models
• learned priors or ranking models for candidate outputs