rtd: imperial_frame out of packet example (ruling) + DRAFT Dao path-fit ontology (proposal, not canon) #6
2026-11-06
rtd: scope and provenance fixes from review (Nibu)
Mark the edited imperial/language-design.md lines as proposal, cite the full ruling id, drop chat memory ids from dao-ontology.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
rtd imperial: path-fit ontology around Dao (placeholder), not shame/honour
New dao-ontology.md: Dao as living well, painting as duty, unpainted as heresy unless path-true, gauche when a statement borrows the look; native terms as context-tagged readings with the chosen gloss recorded apart; claims tagged E/I/E->I. language-design.md re-framed where it leaned on shame. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
rtd: move imperial_frame out of the packet example
The example carried imperial_frame, an imperial-ontology reading, in the client packet, contradicting rtd-imperial-aesthetic-reading-to-ontology. Replace it with neutral facts plus stance and say why. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>