docs: Mind feedback pages (the desk) design record #24
2026-11-10
docs: desk section points to Heimdall's rule file (answer rule) and CultLib #72 (wire) instead of restating them
All checks were successful
Build pull request / Build pull request (pull_request) Successful in 3m42s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs: desk section: retraction rule agreed in #swarm
Some checks failed
Build pull request / Build pull request (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs: feedback pages are the desk: Fork Desk keeps, field names, pick and note rules
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs: feedback pages: no content hash, route 2 credential, receiver store and names
Erase keeps record id, kind and time only; an unsalted hash confirms a guessed text. Credential is the OIDC access token Bifrost issues to chat, claims check open. Receiver store is a CultCache file with backup purge owed before deploy. Receiver must not reuse CurrentBifrostActor.DisplayName; no guest exists until Bifrost PR #9. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs: align feedback pages spec with the Huginn feedback kinds proposal
The proposal owns the schema: feedback_listing, feedback_answer (text-free), feedback_close_request, feedback_hide. Bifrost holds answer text and does the erase; delivery is by mouth and the Persona admits the record. Question key, option labels and askedAt follow the proposal. Client plan kept: typed interface mirroring those shapes, fixtures first. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs: Mind feedback pages spec (placement, close, hiding, receiver)
Folds Kiko's spec with Heimdall's draft rulings on guests, erase and hiding. Design only; no code. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>