Phone hit: Spread28/36, Room36, shared test kit and size-tie check #129
2026-11-13
Phone hit kit: pin Room composition, spread props are undetermined, tighter tag match
All checks were successful
Build pull request / Build pull request (pull_request) Successful in 4m4s
Room<N> throws when no Spread of its size exists, and a test reads the compiled class lists to prove Room<N> composes Spread<N> and PhoneHit. Props spread into an IconButton or Icon make the size undetermined (allow-list entry required). <IconButton and <Icon match only before whitespace, > or /. iconButtonTags derives from iconButtons. expectSizeTie fails on a file with no IconButton. Fixture tests live in phoneHitTestKit.test.ts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Phone hit tests: shared kit, size tie, pinned new variants
All checks were successful
Build pull request / Build pull request (pull_request) Successful in 2m11s
The helpers moved to phoneHitTestKit.ts so each later group adds its own phoneHit.<group>.test.ts. A new check ties PhoneHitSpread<N>/Room<N> to the px the button draws (IconButton size padding + Icon size); a size the source does not state needs an explicit allow-list entry. It found RoomInput's reply-cancel (16 px icon, 24 px button) carrying Spread32; it is Spread24 now. Room<N> takes its inline margin from the Spread class of the same size, so the two axes cannot disagree. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Phone hit: Spread28, Spread36 and Room36 variants
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>