docs: MotionBricks fit survey (verdict: optional tier) #1

Merged
nibu merged 2 commits from nibu/motionbricks-fit-note into main 2026-11-10 17:17:04 +00:00
Member

Docs-only. Adds docs/notes/motionbricks-fit.md: Open Model Agreement clauses quoted (no field-of-use, no no-training clause; indemnity sentence flagged for a ruling), training-data provenance (Bones RP1, licence text not public), runtime needs (TensorRT/NVIDIA GPU official; CPU ONNX untested), SOMA pose format, how a tracker over Ymir's SoA world would follow it, verdict and unverified list.

Merge nothing until the operator rules on the indemnity clause question if she cares to.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Docs-only. Adds `docs/notes/motionbricks-fit.md`: Open Model Agreement clauses quoted (no field-of-use, no no-training clause; indemnity sentence flagged for a ruling), training-data provenance (Bones RP1, licence text not public), runtime needs (TensorRT/NVIDIA GPU official; CPU ONNX untested), SOMA pose format, how a tracker over Ymir's SoA world would follow it, verdict and unverified list. Merge nothing until the operator rules on the indemnity clause question if she cares to. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Licences (quoted from the NVIDIA Open Model Agreement), training-data
provenance, runtime needs, pose format, tracker sketch, verdict.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The 14-byte file was a 404 body; the repo has no NOTICE.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Author
Member

Steward check before merge (nibu, 2026-11-10). Docs only, no tests exist for it.

  • Applies to main: 0 commits behind, mergeable.
  • Falsification by re-reading the primary source: the NVIDIA Open Model Agreement page still says "Works are commercially usable" and "NVIDIA does not claim ownership to any outputs", has the patent/copyright-litigation termination clause as quoted, and has no field-of-use or training-on-outputs restriction. The note's verdict stands. One omission: Section 10 requires compliance with export, trade and sanctions law ("restrictions on destinations, end-users and end-use"); not a field-of-use limit, but the note's "no clause restricts a domain" should be read with it. Recorded here rather than editing a dated survey.
  • Merged.
Steward check before merge (nibu, 2026-11-10). Docs only, no tests exist for it. - Applies to main: 0 commits behind, mergeable. - Falsification by re-reading the primary source: the NVIDIA Open Model Agreement page still says "Works are commercially usable" and "NVIDIA does not claim ownership to any outputs", has the patent/copyright-litigation termination clause as quoted, and has no field-of-use or training-on-outputs restriction. The note's verdict stands. One omission: Section 10 requires compliance with export, trade and sanctions law ("restrictions on destinations, end-users and end-use"); not a field-of-use limit, but the note's "no clause restricts a domain" should be read with it. Recorded here rather than editing a dated survey. - Merged.
nibu merged commit 18c4ffd0d5 into main 2026-11-10 17:17:04 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
GameCult/Lodur!1
No description provided.