Ruling L1-Q7 (a) persisted the instruction text so that editing a lens's
text in code neither breaks nor alters an in-flight session, but no test
proved a resume reads the stored text. The new test takes a real refused
row, rewrites it as a later build would find it (stored text differs from
the recorded lens's current text, invocation prepared under the stored
text), pushes it through the real store file, reopens, and resumes with a
fresh runner. Every inference after the resume carries the stored text,
the session commits under the same command id, and the row still records
the stored text and the drawn lens.
It pins resume only; nothing ties stored text to the recorded lens, which
remains a recorded cost.
Test-only; no production code changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2c3b513b17