Add reciprocal Oz relationship stance
This commit is contained in:
Meta Vens
parent
e2d8bf5919
commit
1937ffce06
6 changed files with 85 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -218,7 +218,9 @@ they deserve their own canonical storage slot.
|
|||
|
||||
## Relationship Stance
|
||||
|
||||
Relationship stance is directional. `A -> B` can differ sharply from `B -> A`.
|
||||
Relationship stance is directional. A `source_id -> target_id` record describes
|
||||
how the source feels and predicts the target, not a shared relationship object.
|
||||
Reciprocal records can disagree.
|
||||
|
||||
| Label | Meaning |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -176,6 +176,10 @@ care. Fundamental attribution bias also lives here: an observer can mistake
|
|||
exceptional behavior for stable character. None of that requires corrupting the
|
||||
canonical state.
|
||||
|
||||
Relationship stance is directional. If Cat has a relationship record toward Oz,
|
||||
Oz needs a separate record toward Cat. Mutual presence does not imply symmetric
|
||||
trust, fear, obligation, dependence, or expectation of betrayal.
|
||||
|
||||
## Dialogue Context Packs
|
||||
|
||||
Scenes contain `dialogue_context_packs`.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1039,6 +1039,77 @@
|
|||
"unresolved_incident_ids": [
|
||||
"event-drone-lie"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"relationship_id": "rel-oz-cat",
|
||||
"source_id": "oz_operator",
|
||||
"target_id": "cat_marrigan",
|
||||
"stance": {
|
||||
"trust": {
|
||||
"mean": 0.44,
|
||||
"plasticity": 0.56,
|
||||
"current_activation": 0.39
|
||||
},
|
||||
"respect": {
|
||||
"mean": 0.58,
|
||||
"plasticity": 0.45,
|
||||
"current_activation": 0.63
|
||||
},
|
||||
"resentment": {
|
||||
"mean": 0.09,
|
||||
"plasticity": 0.53,
|
||||
"current_activation": 0.07
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dependence": {
|
||||
"mean": 0.31,
|
||||
"plasticity": 0.6,
|
||||
"current_activation": 0.38
|
||||
},
|
||||
"fear": {
|
||||
"mean": 0.42,
|
||||
"plasticity": 0.61,
|
||||
"current_activation": 0.55
|
||||
},
|
||||
"fascination": {
|
||||
"mean": 0.52,
|
||||
"plasticity": 0.55,
|
||||
"current_activation": 0.6
|
||||
},
|
||||
"obligation": {
|
||||
"mean": 0.34,
|
||||
"plasticity": 0.57,
|
||||
"current_activation": 0.42
|
||||
},
|
||||
"envy": {
|
||||
"mean": 0.18,
|
||||
"plasticity": 0.48,
|
||||
"current_activation": 0.2
|
||||
},
|
||||
"moral_disgust": {
|
||||
"mean": 0.03,
|
||||
"plasticity": 0.5,
|
||||
"current_activation": 0.02
|
||||
},
|
||||
"perceived_status_gap": {
|
||||
"mean": 0.46,
|
||||
"plasticity": 0.54,
|
||||
"current_activation": 0.51
|
||||
},
|
||||
"expectation_of_care": {
|
||||
"mean": 0.4,
|
||||
"plasticity": 0.58,
|
||||
"current_activation": 0.48
|
||||
},
|
||||
"expectation_of_betrayal": {
|
||||
"mean": 0.36,
|
||||
"plasticity": 0.6,
|
||||
"current_activation": 0.44
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"summary": "Oz reads Cat as dangerous but potentially protective, and keeps helping while testing whether the suspicion has teeth.",
|
||||
"unresolved_incident_ids": [
|
||||
"event-drone-lie"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"events": [
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -16,3 +16,4 @@
|
|||
{"ts": "2026-05-01T18:54:49+00:00", "type": "design", "status": "accepted", "note": "Removed verbal_response_strategy as a canonical layer. Defensive verbal moves should emerge during projection from interactions among underlying organization, dispositions, behavioral dimensions, presentation strategy, situational pressure, relationship context, and voice style."}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-05-01T18:55:15+00:00", "type": "design", "status": "accepted", "note": "Kept sarcastic deflection, sincerity evasion, emotional evasion, banter-as-boundary, and verbal aggression as target emergent behaviors for projection tests rather than canonical state fields."}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-05-01T19:09:58+00:00", "type": "design", "status": "accepted", "note": "Removed forbidden_context from dialogue context packs. Packs are positive speaker-local payloads; unknown or author-only material is omitted by the projection builder, while known secrets are expressed through goals, beliefs, memories, and presentation constraints."}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-05-01T19:13:15+00:00", "type": "design", "status": "accepted", "note": "Relationship stance is directional. Added Oz->Cat alongside Cat->Oz in the Call of the Void fixture and taught the validator to require reciprocal relationship edges for represented agent pairs."}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ accepted_design:
|
|||
- Defensive verbal responses are derived during projection from underlying organization, dispositions, behavioral dimensions, presentation strategy, situational pressure, relationship context, and voice style rather than stored as a separate canonical layer.
|
||||
- Sarcastic deflection, sincerity evasion, emotional evasion, banter-as-boundary, and verbal aggression are target emergent behaviors for projection tests.
|
||||
- Dialogue context packs are positive-context payloads; unknown or author-only material is omitted rather than listed as forbidden context, while known secrets are handled through goals, memories, beliefs, and presentation constraints.
|
||||
- Relationship stance is directional; reciprocal agent pairs need separate edges because trust, fear, obligation, dependence, and betrayal expectations are not symmetric by default.
|
||||
|
||||
current_status:
|
||||
summary: Ghostlight now has the Epiphany-style persistence spine, the first architecture payload, and the initial canonical agent-state schema seam for Call of the Void-style authoring examples. The schema is still v0 and should be hardened before building prompt projection on top of it.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -165,15 +165,20 @@ def validate_document(document: dict[str, Any], required: dict[str, list[str]],
|
|||
|
||||
event_ids = {event["event_id"] for event in document["events"]}
|
||||
|
||||
relationship_pairs: set[tuple[str, str]] = set()
|
||||
for index, relationship in enumerate(document["relationships"]):
|
||||
path = f"relationships[{index}]"
|
||||
require_keys(relationship, ["relationship_id", "source_id", "target_id", "stance", "summary"], path)
|
||||
require(relationship["source_id"] in agent_id_set, f"{path}.source_id references unknown agent")
|
||||
require(relationship["target_id"] in agent_id_set, f"{path}.target_id references unknown agent")
|
||||
relationship_pairs.add((relationship["source_id"], relationship["target_id"]))
|
||||
validate_variable_map(relationship["stance"], required["relationship_stance"], f"{path}.stance")
|
||||
for event_id in relationship.get("unresolved_incident_ids", []):
|
||||
require(event_id in event_ids, f"{path}.unresolved_incident_ids references unknown event: {event_id}")
|
||||
|
||||
for source_id, target_id in relationship_pairs:
|
||||
require((target_id, source_id) in relationship_pairs, f"relationships missing reciprocal edge: {target_id} -> {source_id}")
|
||||
|
||||
for index, event in enumerate(document["events"]):
|
||||
path = f"events[{index}]"
|
||||
require_keys(event, ["event_id", "kind", "summary", "participants", "pressure_tags"], path)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue