Eureka is extracted from the Aetheria CultCache migration and is the Claude Code counterpart of Epiphany. It covers the faculty loop, brief templates, the cut map shape, the postmortem template, the worked example, a dated comparison with Epiphany, and a changelog tying each rule to its evidence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
45 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
45 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Postmortem template
|
|
|
|
Write the postmortem when the migration closes, from evidence: commits, the cut
|
|
map, Soul reports and transcripts. Use an Eyes pass to gather facts first. Report
|
|
the delta and the scars, not a victory lap.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
# <Migration> postmortem
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
What changed, the scale (lines, dependencies, formats), and the state at
|
|
writing (landed, and what the operator still owes).
|
|
|
|
## Scope and invariants
|
|
The target in brief, what was excluded, and why the earlier attempt failed if
|
|
there was one.
|
|
|
|
## Timeline
|
|
One row per cut: dates, SHA ranges, Soul passes, and the notable finding.
|
|
|
|
## Structural delta
|
|
Estimate against actual, per repo. What was deleted, added and parked.
|
|
|
|
## What Soul caught
|
|
Defects that green tests had passed, grouped by kind (concurrency, wire parity,
|
|
lifecycle and globals, untested rulings, split authority, spec errors). Say how
|
|
each would have failed.
|
|
|
|
## Operator corrections
|
|
Where the operator corrected the agents' understanding or overturned a plan, and
|
|
what context was missing that made the wrong answer look right.
|
|
|
|
## Incidents
|
|
Machine, tooling and process failures, with their cost and the rule each one
|
|
produced.
|
|
|
|
## What worked
|
|
Only what should be repeated, stated as practice.
|
|
|
|
## What to change in the pipeline
|
|
Concrete edits to the skill, each with its evidence.
|
|
|
|
## Open follow-ups
|
|
Item, owner, file, and why it can wait.
|
|
```
|