R-AK was mine. I called a guard duplicate authority and ordered it deleted;
Hands verified, got it wrong, and left a comment claiming an alias uniqueness
property that the source contradicts. A legal document shape now takes every
hop path into an untyped exception, the peer gets no typed refusal, and the
batch's own new dispatch backstop swallows it without a log. Restoring the
guard leaves the suite green, which is the other half of the problem.
That is the second redundancy ruling of mine to be wrong. The first was caught
by Hands; this one was not. A deletion argued from a property has to be probed
at the shape that would break it.
R-AF is genuinely settled and Soul confirmed it harder than the probe did: the
reference type has nowhere to put a schema id, so no formatter or version can
introduce one. Both runtimes now agree on every shape that split them,
including the role-filter reordering no ruling covered.
R-AH has slipped five passes and cannot be built as I ruled it, because the
ruling never fixed map encoding, field order, or whether an absent optional is
nil or omitted, and because C# has no page type at the layer the vectors
test. This batch decides all four. Until it lands, the map now claims semantic
parity over a named field subset rather than byte parity, because byte parity
is not true today and the smaller honest claim is worth more.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
69d736def5