contracts/cultnet/governance/fork-card.md

@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ Source: the desk's client needs (Ratatoskr PR #24 section 12, `ratatoskr-desk-sp
 - **M2.** An unknown Mind gets **the same refusal as an unknown fork**: `fork_unknown`, 404, the same bytes (the document's `error` names neither the Mind nor the fork). The list of Minds is not probeable. Auth is judged first, so a caller without a valid token, scope or Active membership learns nothing about which Minds exist.
 - **M3.** On the POST the route's Mind must hold `fork_id`: step 3 is judged against **that Mind's** stored forks, so a `fork_id` the route's Mind does not hold is `fork_unknown` and nothing is stored, in either Mind. A fork cannot be answered through another Mind's route. A body that names `mind` is `body_unknown_field`: the Mind is the route's.
 - **M4.** Scopes are **not per Mind**: `desk.read` and `desk.answer` open the routes of every configured Mind; which forks a caller may see or answer is the card's audience and decider list.
-- **M5. The decider list is sent per call.** Bifrost holds the admin-set list and sends it with **every answer, read and list request** to Huginn, as a typed field on the same peer-checked door; Huginn keeps no copy of it. Because it travels with read and list too, a projected card's `deciders` is the list of that call, and step 5 judges an answer against the list the same call carried. It comes only from Bifrost's admin-set state: never from a Mind and never from any request body a client controls: no HTTP field, header or query parameter on any desk route sets or extends it, and a body naming `deciders` is `body_unknown_field` (scenario `M5_...`). A request carrying it from a Mind's own door or session is refused. **This is Bifrost and Huginn work and no vector here can test it** (the typed field and the door's wire are pending, open choice 3); the rule is stated so that the cut that builds the request has it. (Heimdall's ruling, #minds 2026-11-10 19:26Z; it replaces the earlier reading of a list Huginn receives once and holds.)
+- **M5. The decider list is sent per call.** Bifrost holds the admin-set list and sends it with **every answer, read and list request** to Huginn, as a typed field on the same peer-checked door; Huginn keeps no copy of it. Because it travels with read and list too, a projected card's `deciders` is the list of that call, and step 5 judges an answer against the list the same call carried. It comes only from Bifrost's admin-set state: never from a Mind and never from any request body a client controls: no HTTP field, header or query parameter on any desk route sets or extends it, and a body naming `deciders` is `body_unknown_field` (scenario `M5_...`). A request carrying it from a Mind's own door or session is refused. **This is Bifrost and Huginn work and no vector here can test it** (the typed field and the door's wire are pending, open choice 3); the rule is stated so that the cut that builds the request has it. (Heimdall's ruling, #minds 2026-11-10 19:26Z; it replaces the earlier reading of a list Huginn receives once and holds.) **Envelope names:** the desk's envelope on that door uses the names this page uses, `mind`, `authority`, `subject` and `deciders`, with no conversion at the door (Eureka, #minds 2026-11-10 19:58Z); `deciders` is a per-call list of short ids at the envelope's top level beside `subject`, never inside the request body, and Huginn keeps no copy.
 
 Calls 1 and 2 are enough for a read-only desk. Every response is the pinned MessagePack document or its JSON form with the same keys (open choice 1 of `vote-api.md`: the media type is unsettled).