Soul found this while confirming batch 8. The Survivor-5 header in the same
file was updated when the component was deleted and this one was not, so it
described a comparator that no longer exists.
Self edited this directly rather than dispatching Hands for a single stale
sentence. Naming that because Self editing code is a boundary worth saying
out loud when it is crossed, even for a comment.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Soul could not construct a selection where To.SchemaId decides the
EdgesFor/page_edges order once From, Role and To.RecordKey already
tie, but flagged that as a claim, not a proof - the same shape of
argument that was wrong twice before on this comparator (R-AT).
Traced instead of asserted: TryResolveReferenceTarget (C#) and
resolve_reference_target (Rust) resolve a reference purely from the
citer's schema, the role, and the record key, against the evaluation's
own fixed candidate index (byKey/by_key) - no edge- or caller-specific
input steers which candidate wins. Once From and Role tie (pinning the
citer's schema and the declared target type/leaves) and To.RecordKey
also ties, the resolved row - schema included - is forced identical by
construction, in both runtimes, every time. No mutation can distinguish
it because no input can, so it was deleted rather than recorded as
"equivalent": a component nothing can distinguish is a line every
future reader must reason about for no behavioural gain.
Deletes the To.Descriptor.SchemaId/to.schema_id() ThenBy/then_with from
CultNetSelectionEvaluator.EdgesFor and selection.rs's page_edges sort,
and updates the comments (in-code and the Survivor 5 test block) that
described the old five-key chain.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
R-AF: registers ParityCiterNarrow (citer_narrow's C# type, [CultIndex
"narrow_ref"] so its role matches the fixture/Rust spelling), adds
Keys-scoped vectors pinning both shapes from Soul's table - a shared key
where the only candidate is out of target refuses evaluation-time
(expectedEvaluationRefusal, a narrow addition to the vector schema
distinct from the door-only expectedRefusalField - not R-Z/R-AH's
page-bytes harness), and one where an in-target row shares a key with an
out-of-target row and must still resolve.
Landing these exposed a real, pre-existing cross-runtime scope
difference in R-W unrelated to R-AF: Rust checked every declared
reference on a row regardless of the citation's requested role;
C#'s ReferenceMembers(descriptor, citation.Role) narrows by role first.
Fixed on the Rust side (previous commit); hop_by_role_cites_exact_id and
cites_target_by_name_alias keep an explicit Keys scope here anyway as
belt-and-suspenders.
Also corrects S-12's last stale comment: cites_target_by_name_alias's
"Confirmed cross-runtime defect" note was already false - the alias port
fixed it - and still called it confirmed.
R-AJ: CultNetSelectionSurvivorTests.cs's row-tiebreak fixture
(Evaluator_BreaksAnOrdinalTieBySchemaIdThenRecordKeyInBothDirections) was
degenerate - probed by hand-reverting the source and swapping the
tiebreak's two ThenBy calls, it still passed, because whether the old
3-row fixture discriminated the swap depended on which of SelLeafA's/
SelLeafB's real schema ids happened to sort first, and on this repo's
ids it didn't. Rewritten to assign row keys relative to the schema ids
discovered at runtime (low-sorting schema gets the high-sorting key and
vice versa) so the two candidate orderings are always the exact reverse
of each other; reprobed the same mutant afterward and it now fails.
Adds a direct EdgesFor test (constructing FullEvaluation/EdgeMatch by
hand) pinning "From.Key before Role" in the five-key edge tiebreak - the
two existing EdgesFor tests each tie one of those two components, so
neither could tell a Role-first mutant from the rule.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The first Stryker pass (72.18%, up from 66%) showed the named dozen mostly
dead but surfaced two related gaps the "differs" style of assertion cannot
reach on its own:
- ComputeDigest's field-number and cites.role presence flags each had an
equality-mutation survivor (field.Number != null / selection.Cites.Role
!= null) that a same-vs-different digest comparison cannot catch: the
mutant swaps which of two cases gets which flag value, so both cases
still digest differently, just under swapped labels. A handful of plain
AppendString/sb.Append deletions survived alongside it for the same
reason - removing content that a same-vs-different pair didn't happen
to isolate. One independently reconstructed golden HMAC value, built
from the method's own doc comments rather than its private helpers,
pins the whole wire shape at once: any single append or flag polarity
wrong breaks the exact match.
- EdgesFor's OrderBy(pageRowIndex) - the primary "page-row order" key R-B
names before "(from, role, to)" - had no test forcing page position and
from/role/to order to disagree, so it survived alongside (and separate
from) the five ThenBy mutants already named.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Soul's triage on 52082ec named ~12 live survivors across
CultNetSelection.cs/CultNetSelectionEvaluator.cs, each sitting on a rule
this cut exists to enforce, plus 75 uncovered mutants behind them. Each
new test drives the public selection/evaluator surface with a fixture
built to make the rule's failure observable in the answer, not in the
code's spelling - several needed new fixtures (a mixed numeric/string
alias, an index alias differing from its member name, two reference
members resolving to one target) because their absence is why the
mutant survived in the first place.
Two of the five EdgesFor order-flip mutants (To.SchemaId/To.Key) are not
addressed: within one hop direction an edge's (From, Role) already
determines its To deterministically, so no legal selection can tie
anchor+From+Role while To differs. Recorded as a likely equivalence,
left for Stryker's own verdict rather than forcing a contrived test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
