Estate-rule sim harness: populism, strategic agents, transitive delegation #4
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "heimdall/estate-rule-sim"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Standing sim harness for the unified estate rule,
docs/research/2026-11-05-estate-rule-sim/. Spec with sources first (SPEC.md), pure stdlib Python (estatesim.py,run.py), 31 tests, fixed seeds, one-command rerun (python3 -I run.py, about 3 min; byte-identical output). Results inresults.md, honest read inREPORT.md.Headline: UNI lowers populism sensitivity by 0.02-0.07 against a direct tally but lowers merit tracking by more (0.05-0.10), so appeal-per-merit is not better at equal weights; it passes more bad-popular motions at low thresholds; winner-take-all raises populism sensitivity. It helps most against an organized Users faction. Delegation (transitive, scoped, revocable, capped, depth 2..unlimited) hardly changes outcomes; the cap controls concentration; depth is inert; the posted revocation rule decays the network without renewal. Pre-registered verdict: supported in 0 of 127 cells, fails in 2, undecided 125.
Not merged, per instruction. Follow-ups served:
heimdall-body:follow_up:chat-s1938-1941andchat-mind-20261105T002133411Z-t0.🤖 Generated with Claude Code