No description
  • Python 75.1%
  • TypeScript 7.8%
  • JavaScript 7.5%
  • HTML 6.4%
  • CSS 2.9%
  • Other 0.3%
Find a file
Repository files (latest commit first)
Filename Latest commit message Latest commit date
2026-04-22 13:24:07 +01:00
docs Use sharper source references in snap and refine 2026-04-22 13:24:07 +01:00
examples/corpus Add corpus benchmarks and lattice refinement 2026-04-21 21:56:25 +01:00
scripts Use sharper source references in snap and refine 2026-04-22 13:24:07 +01:00
src/repixelizer Use sharper source references in snap and refine 2026-04-22 13:24:07 +01:00
tests Use sharper source references in snap and refine 2026-04-22 13:24:07 +01:00
.gitignore Add corpus benchmarks and lattice refinement 2026-04-21 21:56:25 +01:00
pyproject.toml Bootstrap the repixelizer CLI project 2026-04-21 16:10:55 +01:00
README.md Add reproducible README preview generator 2026-04-22 12:06:43 +01:00

Repixelizer

Repixelizer is a standalone Python CLI for images that are doing a pixel art impression instead of actually respecting the grid.

It is aimed at the annoying middle ground: sprites, emblems, and logos that look locally pixelated but fall apart the second you ask them to commit to one lattice like grown-ups.

Instead of pretending this is a resize problem, Repixelizer treats it as lattice inference plus local structure preservation: infer the implied grid, choose real output cells, and snap them back onto a coherent pixel lattice while preserving the source's local adjacency patterns.

Examples

Repixelizer was built to rescue fake pixel art, but it can also be used to generate pixel art directly from non-pixel source art when the shapes are clean and the local structure is doing something useful.

Rows show the source art, a plain Lanczos downscale to the same target size, and the repixelized result. The bottom row also carries a sword-guard picture-in-picture, because that tiny region is one of the more honest tests of whether the tool is preserving local cell adjacency instead of just getting the vibes approximately correct.

Repixelizer example comparison

That is the two-headed pitch in one image: force non-pixel art onto a coherent grid, or take AI pixel art that only respects the grid locally and make it commit.

Current Status

This is already a serious experimental baseline, not a toy prototype:

  • CUDA-backed inference and solver paths are wired up
  • round-trip corpus benchmarking is built in
  • soft and crisp corruption profiles are supported
  • diagnostics and baseline comparisons are written automatically
  • a black-box tuning harness exists for longer offline parameter sweeps

The current pipeline is especially strong on benchmarked sprite and emblem inputs where local fake-pixel texture is meaningful but the global grid is inconsistent.

Quickstart

python -m venv .venv
.venv\Scripts\python -m pip install -e .[dev]

Run the optimizer:

repixelize input.png --out output.png
repixelize input.png --out output.png --diagnostics-dir diagnostics --device auto

Run the optimizer plus baselines:

repixelize compare input.png --out output.png --diagnostics-dir diagnostics

Corpus And Benchmarks

Prepare a local Creative Commons corpus:

repixelize prepare-corpus --corpus-dir examples/corpus

Run the round-trip benchmark:

repixelize benchmark --corpus-dir examples/corpus --out-dir artifacts/benchmark

Useful benchmark flags:

  • --profile soft or --profile crisp
  • --case <name> repeated for a focused slice
  • --limit <n> for the first n matching cases
  • --infer-size to test automatic size inference
  • --keep-existing if you explicitly want to preserve an old output directory

By default the benchmark clears its output directory before each run so the artifacts folder stays readable.

Tuning

Repixelizer includes a black-box tuning loop for longer offline searches over solver weights:

repixelize tune --corpus-dir examples/corpus --out-dir artifacts/tuning --profile soft --limit 8

This is intentionally a search-based tuner, not gradient descent. The objective depends on discrete argmins, thresholding, and benchmark comparisons, so it is better treated as a repeatable black-box optimization problem.

Repository Hygiene

This repo is set up to be safe for local experimentation:

  • generated outputs under artifacts/ are ignored
  • local corpus payloads under examples/corpus/originals/ are ignored
  • archived raw sprite sheets under examples/corpus/source-sheets/ are ignored
  • generated corpus metadata files are ignored

That keeps benchmark assets, attribution exports, and tuning runs from polluting upstream history while still keeping the code, docs, and corpus layout tracked.

Repo Layout

  • src/repixelizer: core package
  • tests: focused regression tests
  • docs/spec.md: product and technical spec
  • docs/implementation-plan.md: working roadmap
  • examples/corpus/README.md: local corpus layout and attribution workflow

Core modules:

  • inference.py: target size and phase inference
  • continuous.py: source-aware lattice snapping and local discrete refinement
  • metrics.py: fidelity, adjacency, and motif metrics
  • benchmark.py: corpus benchmark runner
  • tuning.py: black-box hyperparameter search harness
  • synthetic.py: facsimile generation for tests and benchmarks

Validation

Run the focused test suite with:

.venv\Scripts\python -m pytest -q

Regenerating README Assets

The README comparison sheet is generated from repo-tracked fixtures, not from random artifacts left lying around:

.venv\Scripts\python scripts\generate_readme_previews.py --vector-input tests\fixtures\real\ai-badge-vector.png --ai-input tests\fixtures\real\ai-badge-cleaned.png --out-sheet docs\readme-assets\badge-example-sheet.png --out-guard-crop docs\readme-assets\guard-right-crop-comparison.png --scratch-dir artifacts\readme-build --device cpu

That regenerates the README sheet, the standalone sword-guard closeup strip, and scratch outputs under artifacts/readme-build/ so you can inspect the actual low-res results used to build the docs sample.

Diagnostic Closeups

For docs or regression notes, you can generate reproducible source/output closeups from output-grid cell coordinates with:

.venv\Scripts\python scripts\render_focus_crop.py --input tests\fixtures\real\ai-badge-cleaned.png --out docs\readme-assets\guard-right-crop-source-final.png --cell-bbox 73 20 107 44 --panels source,final --scale 16 --steps 48 --device cpu

If you want the full internal state sheet instead of the docs-facing comparison:

.venv\Scripts\python scripts\render_focus_crop.py --input tests\fixtures\real\ai-badge-cleaned.png --out docs\readme-assets\guard-right-crop-states.png --cell-bbox 73 20 107 44 --panels source,snap,relaxed,final --scale 16 --steps 48 --device cpu

Notes:

  • --cell-bbox is in output-grid coordinates, not source-image pixels.
  • The script maps that region back to the matching source crop automatically.
  • --device cpu is the polite choice for docs generation if you do not want to stress the GPU for a tiny crop.

Notes

  • The local corpus is optional; the codebase is still usable without it.
  • The benchmark and tuning commands are designed for iterative local work, not for shipping generated artifacts in git.
  • Palette enforcement is optional and can be left off for unconstrained recovery runs.