- the cleaned real badge fixture in `tests/fixtures/real/ai-badge-cleaned.png` still beats naive resize on source-lattice consistency on the continuous path
- the latest full-emblem tile-graph atomic probe under `artifacts/full-emblem-tile-graph-atomic-v3-cuda/` lands at `0.0224` source-fidelity, beating the older full-emblem tile-graph CUDA baseline at `0.0283`
- the new algorithm map in `docs/tile-graph-algorithm-map.md` confirms that the pinned `126x126` tile-graph badge collapse is already present in the tile-graph initial assignment; the fixed-lattice pipeline path itself is reproducing that bad state faithfully rather than introducing it, and the newer extraction coverage fix now guarantees that occupied output cells are not silently losing their source-region bucket under the corrected full-size lattice mapping
- the new architectural split kept the fixed synthetic emblem baselines byte-identical on both engines at the moment it landed: the pinned tile-graph output hashed to `31e3bc2c...6ae9` and the pinned continuous output hashed to `404748af...7903`
This pass is the first serious speed pass after the algorithm cleanup: replace the expensive per-component window-walk extractor with a grouped `(component_id, output_cell)` overlap reducer and then measure the tradeoff honestly.
-`analysis.py` now has separate prep paths, but both are edge-only after the first optimizer cut; the continuous k-means cluster scout was removed because its only production job was turning coarse color partitions into fake edge guidance
-`source_reference.py` was split so tile-graph could have its own lean prep contract, but the next cut removed tile-graph's need for any separate source-reference object at all
-`tests/test_pipeline.py` now locks in fixed continuous and tile-graph output hashes from a pre-refactor baseline so this architectural cut cannot silently drift behavior
- the old per-component queue/seed/window extractor is gone; `_extract_source_region_tiles(...)` now directly reduces `(component_id, output_cell)` overlaps into candidate shards
- the old stroke-aware slicing machinery and its tuning knobs are gone along with that extractor
- same-component continuation now defines tile-graph adjacency directly, replacing the previous search-heavy neighbor heuristic inside extraction
- on the cleaned badge at pinned `126x126` / phase `(0.0, -0.2)`, the new grouped-extraction CUDA path now takes about `16.1s` on the first same-process run and about `6.0s` on the cached rerun, with `tile_graph_model_cache_hit=True` on the second pass
- the current deep-dive diagnosis is that the fixed-lattice garbling is not a wrapper bug and not mainly a parity-solver bug; it is born in tile cutting, candidate truncation, local source support, and the first unary argmin assignment
- the extraction coverage bug turned out to be real but secondary: the new `_extract_source_region_tiles(...)` overlap fill pass now guarantees that any output cell containing opaque sampled source pixels gets at least one extracted region bucket, but the pinned `126x126` badge output remains numerically unchanged (`0.4998626`), which narrows the remaining failure to candidate ranking and lattice-conditioned reference usage rather than empty region buckets
- the latest full-emblem atomic probe under `artifacts/full-emblem-tile-graph-atomic-v3-cuda/` lands at `0.0224` source-fidelity with `34278` candidates and about `2.16` average choices per cell
- that beats the earlier full-CUDA tile-graph baseline (`0.0283`) and materially improves on the first atomic-only attempt (`0.1571`), which chose atomic regions too eagerly and then let the solver blur them out again
- the latest core algorithm cut removes `source_region_stride`, removes portrait-based candidate ranking, removes sharp/edge foreground fallback injection, and replaces sampled-delta pairwise scoring with adjacency learned from extracted tiles
- that cut also removes the dedicated `TileGraphSourceReference` entirely: tile-graph now grounds itself in full-resolution extracted tiles plus direct per-cell source summaries (`cell_mean_rgba`, `cell_alpha_mean`, `cell_edge_strength`)
- on the cleaned badge at pinned `126x126` / phase `(0.0, -0.2)`, the portrait-free cut first recovered the fixed-lattice run from roughly `0.5055` source-fidelity down to `0.1814`; the new grouped-extraction speed pass regresses a bit to `0.2036` while making the same case roughly `6x` faster cold on CUDA
- a fresh CPU profile of the grouped extractor shows the bottleneck has moved: `build_tile_graph_model(...)` now takes about `61.0s` instead of `145.8s`, and `_extract_source_region_tiles(...)` no longer dominates; the new hot spot is `_segment_atomic_source_regions(...)` at about `59.5s`
- split tile-graph iteration into a cached model-build phase and a near-free solve phase so weight tuning does not keep paying the `~131s` source-region cutting bill
- extend the current fixed-lattice path so repeated CLI runs can reuse cached model artifacts across processes instead of only within one Python process
- decide whether the continuous path should stay the only global search/rerank engine or whether tile-graph eventually needs its own lighter lattice chooser
- evaluate whether the tile-graph propagation loop should become more contour-aware or simply stay more conservative now that the initial assignment is stronger
- rerun tuning after the tile-graph objective and candidate sets stabilize
- decide whether the tile-graph path should stay an alternate solver or become a candidate generator for the continuous refine stage
That documentation pass is now in `docs/optimizer-algorithm-map.md`.
The new map does for `continuous.py` what `docs/tile-graph-algorithm-map.md` does for tile-graph:
- walks the optimizer from pipeline entry to final output
- names the real state variables the machine carries (`uv0_t`, `initial_representative_t`, `source_lattice_reference`, `source_reliability_t`, `snap_t`)
- explains the regular UV lattice, representative portrait, source lattice portrait, source-first snap, relaxed handoff, and discrete refine stages in plain language
- identifies the main contradictions still living in the optimizer, especially:
- the machine maintaining two overlapping portraits of the same lattice and spending much of its complexity mediating between them
- adjacency / motif / line structure being expressed repeatedly in several slightly different dialects
The first optimizer cut landed immediately after that map:
-`optimize_uv_field(...)` was renamed to `optimize_lattice_pixels(...)`
- the unused `_exemplar_colors(...)` helper and its test were removed
- continuous analysis stopped building a k-means `cluster_map`
-`continuous.py` now uses only real source edges for guidance instead of blending in coarse cluster boundaries
- the pinned cleaned-badge continuous smoke run under `artifacts/optimizer-cut-v1-badge-126/` still behaves coherently after the cut: snap scores `0.08100`, final scores `0.07535`, and the generated preview is `diagnostics/output-preview.png`
-`_source_detail_delta_tensors(...)` computes premultiplied source-detail deltas once instead of repeating the same `premultiply(...)` calls for each axis
-`optimize_lattice_pixels(...)` is now an orchestration shell around prep, snap, refine, the source-fidelity guardrail, and artifact packaging
- the pinned cleaned-badge continuous smoke run under `artifacts/optimizer-cut-v2-prep-badge-126/` is byte-size identical to the previous preview and preserves the same source-fidelity numbers: snap `0.08100`, final `0.07535`
Next after that:
- add a focused ablation runner for pinned badge/emblem cases before cutting more behavior
- collapse duplicated adjacency / motif / line voices only after ablation shows which stage owns each idea
- put relax on trial now that refine itself is source-first
The third optimizer cut is behavioral:
- refine no longer scores candidates against the representative portrait
-`_structure_score(...)` no longer includes representative-match as a final tiebreaker
- the dead refine/structure representative knobs were removed from `SolverHyperParams` and the tuning harness
- the pinned cleaned-badge continuous smoke run under `artifacts/optimizer-cut-v3-source-refine-badge-126/` improved slightly: snap stayed `0.08100`, final moved from `0.07535` to `0.07485`
The fourth optimizer cut trims relax rather than removing it:
- the old `refine_relaxed_mode_weight` bonus is gone, so greedy refine is no longer biased toward the relaxed-mode selection on every candidate score
- the core relax stage is still kept, because the earlier ablation showed that turning relax off entirely made the pinned badge worse
- the pinned cleaned-badge continuous smoke run under `artifacts/optimizer-cut-v4-relax-bonus-badge-126/` improved again: snap stayed `0.08100`, final moved from `0.07485` to `0.07451`
Next after that:
- keep putting relax on trial, but now term-by-term instead of as a monolith
- add a focused ablation runner for pinned badge/emblem cases before cutting more behavior
- collapse duplicated adjacency / motif / line voices only after ablation shows which stage owns each idea
The next pass turned that "put relax on trial" note into an actual measurement seam:
-`SolverArtifacts` now carries stage diagnostics for continuous runs, including the exact selected-source displacement field for `snap`, `relax_handoff`, `relax_mode`, and `final_output`
-`run.json` now includes `optimizer_displacement` metrics, and diagnostics directories now write color-coded displacement previews for those stages
- the pinned cleaned-badge comparison under `artifacts/optimizer-relax-purpose-check/` runs the same fixed lattice twice: once with normal relax and once with `relax_iterations=0`
What that test says:
-`relax` still helps a little on the real badge objective: final source-fidelity improves from `0.07549` without relax to `0.07451` with relax
- but the displacement field does **not** become clearly smoother in the way the original design story promised
- on that same pinned badge run, final orthogonal displacement jitter is `1.7154` with relax versus `1.6783` without it, and final local residual is `1.1548` with relax versus `1.1312` without it
- the honest read is that the current relax stage behaves more like a soft consensus / handoff stabilizer over fixed local candidate trays than a true large-swath phase adjustment mechanism
That means the next optimizer cuts should treat `relax` as a measurable subsolver with a narrower actual job, not as a sacred phase-field story we keep around out of nostalgia.
The next real optimizer move is not another incremental trim on the old tray-based solver. It is a restart toward the smaller machine now mapped in `docs/lean-optimizer-algorithm-map.md`.
What that new map says plainly:
- keep lattice inference and edge scouting
- keep one fixed grid of cell centers
- attach one displacement vector `(dx, dy)` to each output cell, initialized to zero
- optimize that displacement field directly
- use a tiny objective with only:
- local solidity / coherence
- smoothness
- edge-aware smoothness
- anti-collapse / anti-fold constraints
- displacement magnitude regularization
- sample the final output once from the optimized field
What that restart explicitly rejects:
-`representative_t`
-`source_lattice_reference`
-`source_reliability_t`
- tray-based snap / relax / refine as the core optimizer state
- repeated adjacency / motif / line dialects trying to compensate for each other
Why this is the right next cut:
- the current optimizer map now makes the contradiction impossible to ignore: the code is not really optimizing phase directly anymore
- the relax diagnostics proved that one of the old justifications was overstated; the machine gets a tiny score win from relax, but not the promised broad-swatch phase drift
- the user's target description is cleaner than the current code: find cell size, initialize a phase field at zero, wiggle it into solid areas coherently, sample, done
1. compare the new `phase-field` mode against pinned badge and emblem runs before porting any old heuristics
2. improve the local evidence term so the field is pulled harder into solid fake-pixel interiors
3. tune the projection / spacing story so the field can drift farther without collapsing or freezing
4. only then consider importing a small number of old heuristics if they clearly help
What has already landed:
- a brand-new `src/repixelizer/phase_field.py` module
- an experimental `--reconstruction-mode phase-field` pipeline path
- a direct displacement-field optimizer using only:
- local coherence
- local edge avoidance
- edge-aware smoothness
- anti-collapse spacing
- displacement magnitude regularization
- pinned-badge smoke artifacts under `artifacts/phase-field-v1-badge-126/`
First honest result:
- on the cleaned badge at fixed `126x126`, phase `(0.0, -0.2)`, `steps=48`, CUDA
- the new `phase-field` mode lands at `0.1461` final source-fidelity
- that is much worse than the current continuous path (`0.0745` on the same pinned case), but dramatically better than the earlier broken tile-graph collapse and, more importantly, it is being produced by a machine that actually matches its own description
That is a respectable first brick: not good enough, but finally the right shape.
- that same first phase-field badge run is also the clearest proof that `source_fidelity` is not enough as the repo's north star
- visually, the phase-field output preserves the important internal badge structure better than the pinned continuous output
- numerically, the old `source_fidelity` score still calls it worse because it rewards agreement with the lattice reference's mean / sharp portraits
- the repo now also reports `source_structure`, a source-size structural metric that combines:
- foreground reconstruction error
- edge-position error
- stroke wobble
- edge support precision / recall / F1
- exact-match ratio
- on the pinned badge comparison under `artifacts/phase-field-metric-check/`, that new metric finally agrees with human judgment: `phase-field` scores `0.4244` versus continuous `0.4291` where lower is better
- the right side of the sword tip can still wobble instead of tapering cleanly
- thin oblique outline features can still collapse into mushy transitions
- the right-hand guard wing can still lose short dark-light-dark adjacency motifs
- on tile-graph specifically, the remaining failure is less about wrong colors entering the candidate pool and more about the propagation step preferring a smoother local arrangement than the sharper initial assignment
- on the cleaned fixture, the continuous path now lands at `0.0832` source-fidelity in the reproducible probe under `artifacts/badge-final-probe/`, which is materially better than the older documented `0.1494` result and better than naive resize under the same lattice
- on the full emblem, the tile-graph atomic path under `artifacts/full-emblem-tile-graph-atomic-v3-cuda/` now reaches `0.0224`, which is the best tile-graph full-emblem result so far in this repo
- the remaining weakness on tile-graph is not candidate color purity anymore; it is candidate extraction cost plus deciding how aggressive the propagation step should be once the initial assignment is already strong
- on the cleaned badge, the new CCL-backed tile-graph run under `artifacts/badge-tile-graph-ccl-cuda/` still lands at a weak `0.1800`, so the current CCL work should be treated as an infrastructure/performance step rather than a visual-quality fix
- the new grouped-extraction badge run under `artifacts/tile-graph-reducebykey-v1-badge-126/` is the first speed-focused cut that actually changes the preprocessing profile in the right direction: cold CUDA time drops to about `16.1s`, warm cached time is about `6.0s`, and the remaining quality problem is contour precision rather than total collapse
- the latest CPU profile shows that preprocessing is still the story, but the story changed: extraction is no longer the monster, and connected-component labeling / label compression is now the thing to attack next
- that background rhythm is expected from resampling the background pattern and should not be mistaken for proof that the inferred lattice itself is varying in size
- a faster labeler or grouped label-reduction path so tile-graph can keep the new simpler overlap model without paying for label propagation so heavily
