Rewrite site copy in studio voice
This commit is contained in:
Meta Vens
parent
a0e4dbf77a
commit
54e969200c
19 changed files with 68 additions and 73 deletions
|
|
@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ title: A Different Sort of Space
|
|||
<img src="../media/aetheria/aetheria-space.png" alt="A stylized Aetheria space scene." />
|
||||
</figure>
|
||||
|
||||
The old site described Aetheria's visual direction with refreshing honesty: it was not trying to be hard science fiction.
|
||||
The great void beyond has never looked so welcoming. Aetheria makes no attempt at realism, instead presenting a stylized vision of space where gravity wells can become literal wells and scale can bend when it serves the experience.
|
||||
|
||||
Instead, Aetheria aimed for a stylized vision of space where gravity wells could become literal wells, scale could bend when it served the experience, and the void could feel inviting instead of sterile. The point was atmosphere and wonder, not realism for its own sake.
|
||||
The point is atmosphere and wonder, not realism for its own sake.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ title: End of the Line
|
|||
<img src="../media/aetheria/catastrophe.jpg" alt="Aetheria concept art showing catastrophe-themed imagery." />
|
||||
</figure>
|
||||
|
||||
Aetheria: Terminus was pitched on the old site as the first major step into the wider Aetheria universe: a distilled version of larger long-term plans delivered in a rogue-lite ARPG structure.
|
||||
Aetheria: Terminus is the first major step into the wider Aetheria universe: a distilled version of larger long-term plans delivered in a challenging rogue-lite ARPG structure.
|
||||
|
||||
The core objective was simple and strong. Travel through a hostile procedurally generated galaxy, survive its unpredictable challenges, and make your way to the enigmatic Terminus. Megacorporations, hostile conditions, and the general indifference of space all stand between the player and freedom.
|
||||
The objective is simple and strong. Travel through a hostile procedurally generated galaxy, survive its unpredictable challenges, and make your way to the enigmatic Terminus. Megacorporations, hostile conditions, and the general indifference of space all stand between the player and freedom.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,21 +6,21 @@ title: Aetheria
|
|||
|
||||
*"Aetheria is bigger than a wiki, and its publishing surface should be bigger than one too."*
|
||||
|
||||
Aetheria is still the flagship world and game project in the GameCult orbit. The dedicated Quartz site at `aetheria.gamecult.org` is the richer long-term home for lore, essays, fiction, and world-specific publishing. This section keeps the older studio-facing pitch alive and points readers toward the deeper vault when they want more.
|
||||
Aetheria is GameCult's flagship world and most ambitious project: a science-fantasy setting built to support fiction, worldbuilding, and multiple styles of play. The dedicated site at `aetheria.gamecult.org` is the deeper home for lore, essays, fiction, and longer-form publishing. This section keeps the concise studio overview close at hand.
|
||||
|
||||
<div class="gamecult-home-hero">
|
||||
<section class="gamecult-hero-panel">
|
||||
<p class="gamecult-kicker">Flagship world, broader surface.</p>
|
||||
<p>The old GameCult site pitched Aetheria as the largest and most ambitious project in the portfolio: part social simulation, part action RPG, part excuse to build a galaxy weird enough to deserve years of writing. That still tracks.</p>
|
||||
<p>These pages preserve the concise root-site version of that pitch. The dedicated Aetheria site handles the denser worldbuilding.</p>
|
||||
<p>Aetheria is the largest project in the portfolio. The goal is to build a galaxy where player actions can create meaningful and persistent changes to the world, its history, and its future.</p>
|
||||
<p>The long-range vision combines large-scale economic and political struggle with action-RPG exploration, combat, trade, and quests across the same setting.</p>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
<figure class="gamecult-media-card">
|
||||
<img src="../media/aetheria/elysium.png" alt="Aetheria concept art showing a settlement scene." />
|
||||
<p>The root site gives the overview. The subsite gets to be expansive.</p>
|
||||
<p>This is the overview surface. The dedicated Aetheria site is where the setting gets to sprawl.</p>
|
||||
</figure>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
## Legacy Snapshot
|
||||
## Core Pages
|
||||
|
||||
- [End of the Line](/Aetheria/end-of-the-line)
|
||||
- [Welcome to Elysium](/Aetheria/welcome-to-elysium)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ title: Ship-shape and Up to Specs
|
|||
<img src="../media/aetheria/longinus.png" alt="Aetheria ship customization artwork." />
|
||||
</figure>
|
||||
|
||||
You do not have to be an engineer to design a spaceship, but the older GameCult copy made it very clear that it helps.
|
||||
You do not have to be an engineer to design a spaceship, but it sure helps with the wrongful death suits.
|
||||
|
||||
Aetheria's ship customization pitch was about personality as much as loadout math. Components would have distinct qualities, megacorporations would maintain their own catalogs of parts, and players would be able to tune both performance and presentation. It was a buildcraft fantasy with a sense of humor rather than a dry spreadsheet alone.
|
||||
Engage with deep ship customization mechanics where every component has its own personality and every megacorporation has its own catalog of parts for sale, and not for sale. Upgrade your ship, arrange your armaments and accoutrements for maximum efficacy, and fancy up the exterior to suit your tastes. We promise not to judge.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -10,4 +10,4 @@ title: Welcome to Elysium
|
|||
|
||||
Humanity has recently arrived in a new galaxy and is ready to explore its wonders, exploit its resources, and build a fresh frontier.
|
||||
|
||||
In the older Aetheria pitch, the twelve megacorporations that funded the journey had each established their own colonies, turning the business of empire-building into a literal interstellar contest. Elysium was not just a backdrop. It was a whole new field of economic and political struggle.
|
||||
The twelve megacorporations that funded the journey have each established their own colonies, turning the business of empire-building into a literal interstellar contest. Elysium is not just a backdrop. It is a whole new field of economic and political struggle.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,15 +4,15 @@ title: Blog
|
|||
|
||||
# Blog
|
||||
|
||||
*"Shorter updates deserve a workflow that feels lighter than a CMS."*
|
||||
*"Shorter writing belongs in public too."*
|
||||
|
||||
The blog keeps both kinds of GameCult writing in one place: new transition notes about the site itself, and legacy posts from the Grav era that are still worth reading instead of quietly rotting behind old infrastructure.
|
||||
The blog is where shorter GameCult writing lives: announcements, notes, fiction, experiments, and older posts that still deserve to be readable.
|
||||
|
||||
## Transition Notes
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- [Leaving Grav Behind](/Blog/Leaving-Grav-Behind)
|
||||
|
||||
## Legacy Archive
|
||||
## Archive
|
||||
|
||||
- [Hello, World!](/Blog/hello-world)
|
||||
- [Cat and the Chocolate Factory](/Blog/cat-and-the-chocolate-factory/)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,16 +4,16 @@ title: Docs
|
|||
|
||||
# Docs
|
||||
|
||||
*"Durable process belongs in files, not in somebody's memory of how the old site used to work."*
|
||||
*"Durable process belongs in files, not in private memory."*
|
||||
|
||||
This section is for contributor-facing and operational information about the public site and the studio systems around it: how publishing works, how the root site is structured, and how older product ideas like the labor platform were framed.
|
||||
This section holds contributor-facing and operational information about GameCult's publishing surface and studio systems: how publishing works, how the root site is structured, and how the labor platform is supposed to function.
|
||||
|
||||
## Site Docs
|
||||
|
||||
- [Publishing Workflow](/Docs/Publishing-Workflow)
|
||||
- [Site Architecture](/Docs/Site-Architecture)
|
||||
|
||||
## Legacy Product Docs
|
||||
## Platform Docs
|
||||
|
||||
- [Labor Platform](/Docs/labor-platform)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ aliases:
|
|||
|
||||
# Labor Platform
|
||||
|
||||
The Labor Platform was one of the more concrete systems proposed on the legacy site: a web application that would connect GameCult's public projects, contributor workflow, patron history, and internal governance instead of leaving all of that scattered across private memory and third-party tools.
|
||||
The Labor Platform is GameCult's proposed web application for connecting public projects, contributor workflow, patron history, and internal governance instead of leaving all of that scattered across private memory and third-party tools.
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
The original concept was a website-integrated app. Users would sign in with GitHub or a GameCult account, interact with pages on the public site, and trigger actions backed by an application and database layer on the server. That backend would talk to GitHub for issue creation, task assignment, and related contribution data.
|
||||
The platform is conceived as a website-integrated app. Users would sign in with GitHub or a GameCult account, interact with pages on the public site, and trigger actions backed by an application and database layer on the server. That backend would talk to GitHub for issue creation, task assignment, and related contribution data.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Areas
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The original concept was a website-integrated app. Users would sign in with GitH
|
|||
|
||||
Members were meant to be able to browse outstanding issues, volunteer for tasks, and understand the status of the work without spelunking through multiple systems.
|
||||
|
||||
The old platform description expected each task entry to expose:
|
||||
Each task entry should expose:
|
||||
|
||||
- project
|
||||
- task name
|
||||
|
|
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Profiles were meant to capture the context that makes task assignment and compen
|
|||
|
||||
## Motions
|
||||
|
||||
The legacy platform split motions into two broad classes.
|
||||
Motions split into two broad classes.
|
||||
|
||||
### Management
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Management motions would affect the organization itself, including thresholds, r
|
|||
|
||||
### Projects
|
||||
|
||||
Project motions would result in new issues or bounties. These were the route for bug reports, feature requests, balance ideas, and new content proposals. The original concept used positive-vote thresholds by category:
|
||||
Project motions would result in new issues or bounties. These are the route for bug reports, feature requests, balance ideas, and new content proposals. Positive-vote thresholds vary by category:
|
||||
|
||||
- bugs: 15%
|
||||
- cosmetics: 30%
|
||||
|
|
@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ The platform described two overlapping point systems: patrons and contributors.
|
|||
|
||||
### Decay
|
||||
|
||||
To avoid permanent historical lock-in, old point balances were meant to decay over time. The original rule was 1% weekly decay on historical balances, rounded down. Project-specific contribution points would not decay.
|
||||
To avoid permanent historical lock-in, old point balances are meant to decay over time. The rule is 1% weekly decay on historical balances, rounded down. Project-specific contribution points do not decay.
|
||||
|
||||
### Patrons
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ Those tiers were also meant to gate things like revenue sharing eligibility and
|
|||
|
||||
## Revenue Sharing
|
||||
|
||||
The legacy proposal divided revenue into three equal portions:
|
||||
Revenue is divided into three equal portions:
|
||||
|
||||
- one distributed by total contribution points
|
||||
- one distributed by contribution points specific to the project that earned the revenue
|
||||
|
|
@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ The key idea was that some forms of labor are continuous care work, not discrete
|
|||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
The old workflow was straightforward on paper:
|
||||
The workflow is straightforward on paper:
|
||||
|
||||
1. a proposal becomes an issue
|
||||
2. members volunteer
|
||||
|
|
@ -129,4 +129,4 @@ The old workflow was straightforward on paper:
|
|||
5. a maintainer reviews the work
|
||||
6. points and payout are awarded on successful completion
|
||||
|
||||
This page is here as a preserved concept document, not as proof that the system already exists in production. But it remains a useful reference for the kind of contributor platform the studio once intended to build.
|
||||
This remains a concept document rather than a deployed production system, but it shows the shape of the contributor platform GameCult wants to build.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,6 @@ CultPong is a fast, competitive reinterpretation of the classic formula: 1v1 and
|
|||
></iframe>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
Instead of treating pong as a joke premise, the older GameCult pitch framed CultPong as a real versus game. Distinct paddle silhouettes let players redirect the ball at unusual angles, while timed thrusts into the ball add a vicious burst of force if the read is correct. The result is less "retro novelty" and more "panic duel with geometry."
|
||||
Another new take on a classic formula, CultPong is a fast-paced, competitive 1v1 and 2v2 pong game with a twist. Instead of the straight paddles found in the classic, it features a selection of uniquely shaped unlockable paddles that let players bounce the ball in any direction if their placement is precise enough. On top of that, a bash mechanic lets players thrust toward the ball and impart a vicious amount of momentum if the timing is right. The result is a nail-biting shootout where you have to get inside your opponent's head to survive.
|
||||
|
||||
The old site also positioned CultPong as a strong candidate for ranked matchmaking, tournaments, cosmetics, and even mobile play if the latency-handling tech could hold up. That still feels like the right high-level summary for the project here.
|
||||
As an online multiplayer game, CultPong is a natural fit for ranked matchmaking, regular tournaments, and enough skins and cosmetics to let players show off a little. Because the matches work so well in short sessions and suit touch input, it is also a strong candidate for mobile play if the latency-handling tech can hold up.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ title: Metamorphosis
|
|||
|
||||
# Metamorphosis
|
||||
|
||||
Metamorphosis is the stream-integrated creature-collection idea in the GameCult orbit: accessible, social, and built around live audience participation instead of solo progression.
|
||||
Metamorphosis is the stream-integrated creature-collection project in the GameCult orbit: accessible, social, and built around live audience participation instead of solo progression.
|
||||
|
||||
The older pitch imagined it as a Twitch extension game where viewers could capture and train adorable creatures, battle on stream, and keep coming back because the channel itself became the play space. That made it attractive both as a game concept and as a streamer tool: more retention, more audience interaction, and a cleaner reason to hang around between bigger on-stream moments.
|
||||
As a Twitch extension game, Metamorphosis lets viewers capture and train adorable creatures, battle on stream, and keep coming back because the channel itself becomes the play space. That makes it attractive both as a game concept and as a streamer tool: more retention, more audience interaction, and a cleaner reason to hang around between bigger on-stream moments.
|
||||
|
||||
It is still best described here as the studio-facing overview. If the project grows into a deeper public design surface later, this page should stay the simple answer to "what is it and why does it belong here?"
|
||||
Because the mechanics are simple, social, and easy to understand at a glance, it also makes a strong case as a streamer-friendly product rather than only a standalone game. The idea is to give viewers a reason to stay, play, and support the channel while something playful and beautifully rendered unfolds on stream.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ title: Projects
|
|||
|
||||
*"Different projects need different publishing surfaces, but they should still feel like one studio."*
|
||||
|
||||
This section gathers the projects in the GameCult orbit. Some belong mostly on this root site for now, while Aetheria already has a deeper Quartz home of its own.
|
||||
This section gathers GameCult's active projects and near-term experiments. Aetheria carries the broadest world and the deepest publishing surface; CultPong and Metamorphosis are tighter pitches with sharper edges. They still belong to the same studio and the same worldview.
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Projects
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -19,8 +19,3 @@ This section gathers the projects in the GameCult orbit. Some belong mostly on t
|
|||
- [Open Source Model](/Studio/Open-Source-Model)
|
||||
- [A Place for Everyone](/Studio/a-place-for-everyone)
|
||||
- [Games as a Service](/Studio/games-as-a-service)
|
||||
|
||||
## Site Context
|
||||
|
||||
- [Leaving Grav Behind](/Blog/Leaving-Grav-Behind)
|
||||
- [Publishing Workflow](/Docs/Publishing-Workflow)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ title: Contributing
|
|||
|
||||
The first contribution standard is clarity. Notes, docs, project pages, and posts should be easy to edit in a normal text editor and easy to review in Git.
|
||||
|
||||
If you are contributing to the public site:
|
||||
If you are contributing to GameCult's public writing, docs, or project pages:
|
||||
|
||||
- prefer direct Markdown edits over CMS-only workflows
|
||||
- prefer direct Markdown edits over editor-locked workflows
|
||||
- keep structure obvious through headings and short sections
|
||||
- treat overview `index.md` files as navigation hubs, not placeholders
|
||||
- link outward to deeper project-specific homes when that serves readers better
|
||||
|
||||
For Aetheria-specific writing, the primary home remains the dedicated Quartz site at `aetheria.gamecult.org`.
|
||||
For Aetheria-specific lore, essays, and fiction, the fuller public home is `aetheria.gamecult.org`.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ GameCult's bet is that game development works better when the process is legible
|
|||
|
||||
That does not mean every repository is public, every draft is polished, or every decision happens by committee. It means the default operating model should be understandable from the outside and editable from the inside.
|
||||
|
||||
For the website, that principle pushes us toward plain Markdown, static generation, Git history, and tooling that edits well outside a browser CMS.
|
||||
For publishing, that principle pushes us toward plain Markdown, static generation, Git history, and tooling that keeps the content understandable outside opaque admin panels.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,12 +5,12 @@ title: A Place for Everyone
|
|||
# A Place for Everyone
|
||||
|
||||
<figure class="gamecult-media-card">
|
||||
<img src="../media/studio/lavacave.jpg" alt="A lava cave environment image from the legacy GameCult site." />
|
||||
<img src="../media/studio/lavacave.jpg" alt="A lava cave environment image." />
|
||||
<p>Game development is not just code. It is art, writing, music, design, worldbuilding, ops, and all the connective tissue in between.</p>
|
||||
</figure>
|
||||
|
||||
There are many talented people out there who are not cut out for 9-to-5 life or the corporate version of "professional." GameCult was always supposed to make room for them instead of filtering them out.
|
||||
There are many talented people out there who are not cut out for 9-to-5 life or the corporate version of "professional." We welcome those people. We are those people. GameCult values the unusual.
|
||||
|
||||
The older site put it bluntly: "We welcome those people. We are those people." That still feels like the right tone. The work here is not only for programmers. Game development pulls in storytelling, visual art, music, interface design, systems thinking, community care, production, and a hundred other skills that normal studio org charts often flatten or undervalue.
|
||||
The magic of game development is that it incorporates nearly every creative pursuit ever invented: storytelling, drawing, music, design, architecture, community care, production, and the connective tissue between them. Writing good code has never been enough.
|
||||
|
||||
So the promise of the studio was never just "open source games." It was "a creative space where unusual people and unusual combinations of skills can actually count."
|
||||
So the promise of the studio is not just "open source games." It is a creative space where unusual people and unusual combinations of skills can actually count.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,14 +5,14 @@ title: Democratizing Gamedev
|
|||
# Democratizing Gamedev
|
||||
|
||||
<figure class="gamecult-media-card">
|
||||
<img src="../media/studio/bounty.jpg" alt="A bounty board style image from the legacy GameCult site." />
|
||||
<p>The original pitch was simple: if a task exists, people should be able to see it, volunteer for it, and be rewarded for completing it.</p>
|
||||
<img src="../media/studio/bounty.jpg" alt="A bounty board style image." />
|
||||
<p>If a task exists, people should be able to see it, volunteer for it, and be rewarded for completing it.</p>
|
||||
</figure>
|
||||
|
||||
Getting paid to work on open source games? That was always the audacious part of the GameCult pitch.
|
||||
Getting paid to work on open source games? You better believe it.
|
||||
|
||||
The legacy site framed this in terms of bounty-driven development. When something needs to get done, it becomes a visible issue with a visible reward. Contributors can step in, do the work, and have that work recognized both financially and organizationally instead of being treated like free invisible labor.
|
||||
With bounty-driven development, passionate members of the community can get involved with GameCult projects and get paid for their work. When something needs to get done, it should become a visible issue with a visible reward. Contributors can step in, do the work, and have that work recognized both financially and organizationally instead of being treated like free invisible labor.
|
||||
|
||||
The same pitch also tied participation to governance. Community members were not meant to be passive spectators. They were meant to be able to propose ideas, support priorities, and eventually grow into a more formal stake in the organization once their history of patronage or contribution made that meaningful.
|
||||
As a multi-stakeholder cooperative, dedicated members of the community should also be able to become voting stakeholders through recurring support and sustained contribution. That gives them a real say in business, game design, development, and work prioritization.
|
||||
|
||||
That exact system still needs modern implementation and a lot of refinement, but the studio idea behind it survives the CMS migration just fine: game development should be more legible, more permeable, and less dependent on closed inner circles.
|
||||
Got a bug that is driving you mad? Want a feature badly enough to rally support around it? Vote for it. The point is to build a more equitable and sustainable relationship with the community and make the games answer to the people they are supposed to serve.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ title: Games as a Service
|
|||
|
||||
<figure class="gamecult-media-card">
|
||||
<img src="../media/studio/stonks.jpg" alt="The GameCult mascot standing in front of a rising chart." />
|
||||
<p>The old site made the business argument with a meme on purpose.</p>
|
||||
<p>The business argument can wear a meme face and still be serious.</p>
|
||||
</figure>
|
||||
|
||||
"Give away the razor, sell the blades" was the older shorthand. The point was not cynicism for its own sake. The point was that networked games and live service infrastructure can create durable value in ways that are harder to clone than a static single-player release.
|
||||
"Give away the razor, sell the blades." Games as a Service is big business, and while many software companies have embraced open source, conventional game studios still treat it like a threat. GameCult is taking that leap with flagship multiplayer experiences that are hard to duplicate because of server infrastructure and network effects and easier to monetize without walling off the whole experience.
|
||||
|
||||
GameCult's wager was that those multiplayer and service-driven projects could fund the more experimental or narrative-heavy work around them. Revenue from the harder-to-duplicate online experiences could subsidize smaller passion projects that deserved to exist even if their pricing stayed light.
|
||||
Revenue from those harder-to-duplicate online experiences can fund more experimental or narrative-heavy work around them. Single-player passion projects only need a nominal install price and a sustainable ecosystem behind them, not a toll booth on the front door.
|
||||
|
||||
That idea still belongs in the studio story, especially now that StreamPixels is becoming the primary server workload. The public site can afford to be static precisely because the server is being reserved for the parts of the business that actually need to stay alive and interactive.
|
||||
The goal is to make games for everyone and build a business sturdy enough to support them without turning every project into the same bland product.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ compositeSections:
|
|||
|
||||
*"A distributed studio needs clear process more than ceremony."*
|
||||
|
||||
The studio section is where the older GameCult pitch turns into a durable shape: why the work is open, how people are meant to participate, what kind of projects fit here, and what the organization has historically promised to build around labor and governance.
|
||||
The studio section lays out how GameCult works, who it is for, and what kind of organization it is trying to become.
|
||||
|
||||
The stitched studio narrative continues below. The standalone notes are still available from their own routes and in the sidebar.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ The stitched studio narrative continues below. The standalone notes are still av
|
|||
- [Games as a Service](/Studio/games-as-a-service)
|
||||
- [The New Hotness](/Studio/the-new-hotness)
|
||||
|
||||
## Publishing Context
|
||||
## Studio Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
- [Leaving Grav Behind](/Blog/Leaving-Grav-Behind)
|
||||
- [Site Architecture](/Docs/Site-Architecture)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,10 +5,10 @@ title: The New Hotness
|
|||
# The New Hotness
|
||||
|
||||
<figure class="gamecult-media-card">
|
||||
<img src="../media/studio/debris.jpg" alt="Legacy debris artwork from the old GameCult site." />
|
||||
<img src="../media/studio/debris.jpg" alt="Abstract debris artwork." />
|
||||
<p>The studio pitch was never about chasing the familiar safest idea. It was about trying to make something worth remembering.</p>
|
||||
</figure>
|
||||
|
||||
Gamers can spot a copycat. If a new project runs on the exact same rails as the current favorite, there is not much reason to jump ship no matter how polished the imitation might be.
|
||||
Gamers can spot a copycat no matter how many new spots it has. There is no reason to take a risk on a new game if the current favorite already runs on the same lines.
|
||||
|
||||
The older GameCult copy leaned hard into originality, risk, and the cliff-edge feeling of trying to build something new in a crowded space. That language was dramatic, but the instinct behind it still holds up. The studio should not exist just to reproduce what already wins by default. It should exist to take weird swings and make them legible enough that other people can join in.
|
||||
So, in pursuit of originality, art, and the sheer cliff-edge adrenaline of hurling ourselves into the void and making something new out of what we find there, the studio should take weird swings instead of polishing safer imitations.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,30 +4,31 @@ title: GameCult
|
|||
|
||||
# GameCult
|
||||
|
||||
*"The old CMS is dead. The studio, the stories, and the strange little mascot still have work to do."*
|
||||
*"Open source game development, cooperative by instinct, strange by design."*
|
||||
|
||||
GameCult is the public front door for the studio: the high-level pitch, the project map, the archive of legacy writing worth keeping, and the bridge out toward deeper publishing surfaces like Aetheria. The goal is not to recreate Grav feature for feature. The goal is to keep the material alive in a workflow that is easier to edit, host, and carry forward.
|
||||
GameCult is a distributed game studio building open worlds, competitive experiments, fiction, and the systems that let players and contributors matter. The work spans flagship settings like Aetheria, sharper standalone ideas like CultPong and Metamorphosis, and the operational thinking required to make a studio like this actually function.
|
||||
|
||||
<div class="gamecult-home-hero">
|
||||
<section class="gamecult-hero-panel">
|
||||
<p class="gamecult-kicker">Quartz on Pages. StreamPixels on the host.</p>
|
||||
<p>The apex site is becoming a static publishing surface again so the server can stop wasting itself on PHP and start doing the job StreamPixels actually needs from it. What stays here is the durable studio story: who we are, what we build, and the older posts and pitches that still matter.</p>
|
||||
<p class="gamecult-kicker">Open by default. Weird on purpose.</p>
|
||||
<p>We believe information wants to be free, contributors deserve visibility, and artistic integrity matters more than sanding every project into something market-safe and forgettable.</p>
|
||||
<p>GameCult is built for programmers, writers, artists, musicians, designers, worldbuilders, organizers, and the gloriously non-corporate.</p>
|
||||
<div class="gamecult-feature-grid">
|
||||
<div class="gamecult-feature-card">
|
||||
<h3>Open by default</h3>
|
||||
<p>Source, docs, and public writing should be inspectable, linkable, and easy to revise in Git.</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div class="gamecult-feature-card">
|
||||
<h3>People before polish</h3>
|
||||
<p>The work is meant to welcome programmers, writers, artists, musicians, designers, and the gloriously non-corporate.</p>
|
||||
<h3>Transparent work</h3>
|
||||
<p>Contributors should be able to see what matters, what needs doing, and where the effort goes.</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div class="gamecult-feature-card">
|
||||
<h3>Flagships and experiments</h3>
|
||||
<p>Aetheria is still the flagship world, but CultPong, Metamorphosis, and newer experiments belong under the same roof.</p>
|
||||
<p>Aetheria is the flagship world, but CultPong, Metamorphosis, and stranger experiments belong under the same roof.</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div class="gamecult-feature-card">
|
||||
<h3>Legacy preserved</h3>
|
||||
<p>The old Grav essays and fiction are not being buried with the CMS. They are getting a cleaner second life.</p>
|
||||
<h3>Cooperative instincts</h3>
|
||||
<p>The studio should answer to the people building and supporting the work, not only to executives and middlemen.</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
|
@ -60,10 +61,9 @@ GameCult is the public front door for the studio: the high-level pitch, the proj
|
|||
- [CultPong](/Projects/CultPong)
|
||||
- [Metamorphosis](/Projects/Metamorphosis)
|
||||
|
||||
## Legacy Posts
|
||||
## Writing
|
||||
|
||||
- [Hello, World!](/Blog/hello-world)
|
||||
- [Rain](/Blog/rain)
|
||||
- [When We Get Home](/Blog/when-we-get-home)
|
||||
- [Cat and the Chocolate Factory](/Blog/cat-and-the-chocolate-factory/)
|
||||
- [Leaving Grav Behind](/Blog/Leaving-Grav-Behind)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue