Clarify lore articles: accessibility wave 18

This commit is contained in:
Meta Vens 2026-09-05 04:13:24 +02:00
commit b7bd6e8fed
2 changed files with 6 additions and 10 deletions

View file

@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
# Sa'ueia Family Units
Sa'ueia family units are squad-sized mobile groups. They combine kinship, defense, childcare, craft, trade, ritual practice, ecological negotiation, and memory keeping.
Sa'ueia families travel together in squad-sized groups. Each group raises children, defends its members, makes things, trades, practices rituals, negotiates with ecological partners, and keeps memories. Kinship holds together work that elsewhere might belong to separate institutions.
## Scale
The intended size allows members to know and trust one another while supporting specialized roles. A wolf pack is a useful comparison for how they move, hunt, and respond to kinship pressures. It explains only part of their life: these families also teach, act as embassies, run workshops, carry goods as caravans, and bind members through oaths.
The unit should be small enough for personal trust and large enough for specialized roles. Wolf-pack comparison is useful for movement, hunting, and kinship pressure, but the units also function as schools, embassies, workshops, caravans, and oath groups.
## Social Logic
Families earn status by maintaining good remembered relations across many ecological partners. A family that hoards, wounds, or breaks route obligations may still physically travel, but the continent stops opening itself to them.
A family's standing depends on good relations with many ecological partners—and on those partners remembering those relations. Hoarding, causing wounds, or breaking obligations along a route can cost a family that standing. Its members may remain physically able to travel, but the continent becomes less open to them. The precise form of that refusal is not specified here; the distinction is between being able to move and having the relationships that make a route available.

View file

@ -7,10 +7,10 @@
## Useful Pressure
Avatar's living network idea is useful because it makes ecology a communicative and sacred infrastructure. This setting pushes harder on the political economy of that infrastructure.
Avatar presents a living network through which ecology supports communication, sacred relationships, and continuity across generations. It offers an inspiration for this setting: organisms and their connections can carry a society's memory.
## Re-engineering
In Avatar, the network often functions as spiritual ecology and planetary continuity. Here, the nearest equivalent, [[Mother Tree Networks]], can preserve memory while also creating hostage relationships.
This setting's nearest equivalent is [[Mother Tree Networks]]. They can preserve communal memory, but access to that memory and ancestral continuity can also depend on obligations. A society's dependence on the network can become a hostage relationship.
The question becomes: what happens when the archive wants payment, and one society invents a tool to stop paying?
The departure from Avatar is an emphasis on who controls this dependence and what they demand in return. The design question is: what happens when the archive wants payment, and one society invents a tool that lets it stop paying?