72 lines
3.2 KiB
YAML
72 lines
3.2 KiB
YAML
profile_id: weksa.target_cultural_ontology.pt-BR.umbanda.v0
|
|
language:
|
|
code: pt
|
|
locale: pt-BR
|
|
script: Latn
|
|
overlay:
|
|
base_profile: data/target-language-ontology/pt-BR.yaml
|
|
kind: religious_cultural_register
|
|
scope: >
|
|
Optional Brazilian Portuguese cultural ontology overlay for Umbanda-related
|
|
scenes, speakers, ritual contexts, or referents. This profile is a consent and
|
|
context gate, not a decorative vocabulary pack.
|
|
authority:
|
|
owns:
|
|
- whether Umbanda-specific register is allowed for a realization
|
|
- sacred or ritual address caution
|
|
- house/tradition specificity warnings
|
|
- syncretic and entity-reference sensitivity
|
|
- anti-caricature constraints
|
|
does_not_own:
|
|
- Umbanda doctrine as a whole
|
|
- authority to invent ritual speech
|
|
- generic Brazilian Portuguese
|
|
- speaker identity unless the speaker context explicitly supplies it
|
|
activation_requirements:
|
|
any_required:
|
|
- source context names an Umbanda scene, terreiro, practitioner, entity, ritual, or discourse community
|
|
- speaker profile explicitly owns an Umbanda-informed voice or memory
|
|
- authoring metadata requests this overlay for reviewed cultural grounding
|
|
never_activate_for:
|
|
- generic Brazilian flavor
|
|
- jokes, insults, mystic ambience, or unexplained exotic texture
|
|
- non-Umbanda religious scenes unless the source context makes a syncretic relation explicit
|
|
salience_axes:
|
|
sacred_address:
|
|
relevant_distinctions:
|
|
- ordinary dialogue
|
|
- respectful reference
|
|
- ritual address
|
|
- entity_or_guide_reference
|
|
lowering_questions:
|
|
- Is the line ordinary speech or ritualized speech?
|
|
- Does the speaker have standing to use sacred address?
|
|
- Should a term be left general until a human reviewer approves specificity?
|
|
house_specificity:
|
|
relevant_distinctions:
|
|
- practices and terms can vary by house, region, and lineage
|
|
- generic flattening can become false authority
|
|
lowering_questions:
|
|
- Is the output pretending one practice represents all Umbanda?
|
|
- Should the trace mark the choice as house-specific or uncertain?
|
|
syncretic_reference:
|
|
relevant_distinctions:
|
|
- Catholic, African, Indigenous, Spiritist, and local references may coexist differently by context
|
|
- entity names and roles are not interchangeable decoration
|
|
lowering_questions:
|
|
- Does the source actually contain the syncretic relation?
|
|
- Does the line preserve respect without overexplaining?
|
|
anti_caricature:
|
|
relevant_distinctions:
|
|
- religious register
|
|
- folkloric stereotype
|
|
- occult ambience
|
|
lowering_questions:
|
|
- Is the output using Umbanda as culture, faith, and practice rather than spooky texture?
|
|
- Would a practitioner recognize this as respectful enough for review?
|
|
forbidden_flattenings:
|
|
- Do not use Umbanda terms as generic magic flavor.
|
|
- Do not invent ritual formulas.
|
|
- Do not collapse Umbanda into Candomblé, Spiritism, Catholicism, or generic Afro-Brazilian religion.
|
|
- Do not imply all Brazilian Portuguese religious language is Umbanda-coded.
|
|
- Do not activate this overlay unless source context or authoring metadata explicitly asks for it.
|