Weksa/.weksa/cultural-ontology/starter-targets.cc
2026-06-09 16:58:03 +01:00

1 line
No EOL
13 KiB
C++
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

“²cultcache.store.v1’—¿weksa.cultural_ontology.catalog¿weksa.cultural_ontology.catalogÙ"weksa.cultural_ontology.catalog.v1¿weksa.cultural_ontology.catalogÙr{"schemaName":"weksa.cultural_ontology.catalog","schemaVersion":"weksa.cultural_ontology.catalog.v1","members":[]}‘¿weksa.cultural_ontology.catalog<6F>—¿weksa.cultural_ontology.profile¿weksa.cultural_ontology.profileÙ"weksa.cultural_ontology.profile.v1¿weksa.cultural_ontology.profileÙr{"schemaName":"weksa.cultural_ontology.profile","schemaVersion":"weksa.cultural_ontology.profile.v1","members":[]}‘¿weksa.cultural_ontology.profile<EFBFBD>””Ù/weksa.cultural_ontology.catalog.seed_targets.v0¿weksa.cultural_ontology.catalog´2026-06-09T15:56:17ZÅ#˜Ù"weksa.cultural_ontology_catalog.v0Ù/weksa.cultural_ontology.catalog.seed_targets.v0Ù'Weksa starter cultural ontology targets­draft_guarded´2026-06-09T16:55:00Z“Ù2weksa.cultural_ontology.pt-BR.vanilla_brazilian.v0Ù+weksa.cultural_ontology.en.transatlantic.v0Ù3weksa.cultural_ontology.ja-JP.kanto.contemporary.v0ƒ»contemporary_kanto_japaneseÙ3weksa.cultural_ontology.ja-JP.kanto.contemporary.v0µtransatlantic_englishÙ+weksa.cultural_ontology.en.transatlantic.v0±vanilla_brazilianÙ2weksa.cultural_ontology.pt-BR.vanilla_brazilian.v0“Ù;Starter CultCache store for utterance lowering experiments.ÙhQdrant evidence retrieval may propose witnesses, but these CultCache entries own accepted seed ontology.ÙeAll three profiles are deliberately broad draft targets; regional overlays must be separate profiles.”Ù+weksa.cultural_ontology.en.transatlantic.v0¿weksa.cultural_ontology.profile´2026-06-09T15:56:17ZňÜÙ"weksa.cultural_ontology_profile.v0Ù+weksa.cultural_ontology.en.transatlantic.v0institutional_register­draft_guarded–¢en¦en-001¤Latnµtransatlantic English‘µtransatlantic English‘´mid-Atlantic English<EFBFBD>ÙµA cultivated transatlantic English register for intelligible cross-Atlantic prose or dialogue. This is not generic American, not generic British, and not a comedy aristocrat accent.’”Ù$salience axes for utterance loweringÙ"activation and forbidden-use gatesÙ$nested linguistic affordance records¿evidence and trace requirements”®source meaning°speaker identityÙ+final wording without an interlingua packet¹whole-culture description•“­United States®United KingdomÙ)Atlantic media and institutional contextsÙLCross-Atlantic educated/media register rather than a native regional dialectÙ[Contemporary use as a style/register target informed by older transatlantic prestige speechÙ8Register target, not ethnic or regional speaker identityÙaUse only when scene, narrator, institution, or authoring metadata asks for transatlantic register”‘Ù+target_profile_selected_by_lowering_request’Ù'generic_flavor_without_target_selectionµmockery_or_stereotype­draft_guarded’µdense_dialect_markingÙ!identity_or_sacred_register_claim‚¯lexical_balance”¯lexical_balance¦stanceÙUAvoid strongly US-only or UK-only lexical anchoring unless source context asks for it‘—¹cross_atlantic_legibility¹cross-Atlantic legibilityÙASelect wording likely to remain natural to both US and UK readers’Ù,Does this word force a side of the Atlantic?¿Is the forced side intentional?<3F><>‘Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.md±prestige_distance”±prestige_distance±identity_indexingÙ=Cultivated diction can signal poise or institutional distance‘—¹cultivated_without_parody¹cultivated without parodyÙRUse controlled syntax and lexical restraint without theatrical old-money imitation’Ù2Is the register doing social work or just costume?Ù1Would plainer English preserve the intent better?<3F><>‘Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.md–<64><E28093>‘œÙ#en_transatlantic_lexical_neutralityÙ!Cross-Atlantic lexical neutrality¥draft“§lexicon¯regional_lexeme¯avoid_side_lockÙRPrefer lexical choices that do not unnecessarily force US or UK regional identity.“Ù"maximize_cross_atlantic_legibilityµselect_neutral_lexeme‘­control panel•‘Ù target_register_is_transatlantic‘Ù$regional_identity_is_source_relevantÂ¥light±reviewed_moderate–<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>”<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>–’Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.mdÙ(docs/cultural-ontology-meta-analysis.tex<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>¦medium’<EFBFBD>‘Ù5Seed feature; requires later corpus-backed expansion.“Ù#en_transatlantic_lexical_neutralityÃÑœÙ$en_transatlantic_measured_directness³Measured directness¥draft“©discourse­stance_marker²controlled_warningÙRWarnings can be direct while retaining cultivated restraint and low slang density.“Ù*preserve_warning_without_bluntness_theatermeasured_direct_clause‘Ù;Do not touch the damaged control; it may put you in danger.•‘Ù scene_allows_cultivated_register‘Ù'urgent_command_requires_bare_imperativeÂ¥light±reviewed_moderate–<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>”<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>–’Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.mdÙ(docs/cultural-ontology-meta-analysis.tex<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>¦medium’<EFBFBD>‘Ù5Seed feature; requires later corpus-backed expansion.“Ù$en_transatlantic_measured_directnessÃÃ<EFBFBD>“Â<EFBFBD><EFBFBD>•¥light±reviewed_moderate¥light’®broad_audience¥local“°cultivated_plain°broadcast_formal³institutional_clear“Ù6Do not treat transatlantic English as British English.ÙLDo not treat transatlantic English as American English with posh vocabulary.ÙYDo not use parody aristocratic diction, fake old-film accent spelling, or class contempt.–’Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.mdÙ(docs/cultural-ontology-meta-analysis.tex<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>¦medium•±activated_profile©axes_used­features_used±features_rejected±reviewer_required”Ù3weksa.cultural_ontology.ja-JP.kanto.contemporary.v0¿weksa.cultural_ontology.profile´2026-06-09T15:56:17ZÅ-ÜÙ"weksa.cultural_ontology_profile.v0Ù3weksa.cultural_ontology.ja-JP.kanto.contemporary.v0¹regional_register_overlay­draft_guarded–¢ja¥ja-JP¤Jpan»contemporary Kanto Japanese‘µç<C2B5>¾ä»£é–¢æ<C2A2>±æ—¥æœ¬èªž‘»contemporary Kanto Japanese‘Ù'weksa.target_cultural_ontology.ja-JP.v0Ù³Contemporary Kanto/Japanese metropolitan lowering target, suitable for Tokyo-area broadly intelligible dialogue. This is not all Japanese, not Kansai, and not historical Japanese.’”Ù$salience axes for utterance loweringÙ"activation and forbidden-use gatesÙ$nested linguistic affordance records¿evidence and trace requirements”®source meaning°speaker identityÙ+final wording without an interlingua packet¹whole-culture description•’¥Kanto·Tokyo metropolitan areaÙTContemporary Kanto-area Japanese speakers and broad standard Japanese media audienceÙ6Contemporary Japanese, not historical or period speechÙbRegional-standard target; does not claim subculture, gendered performance, or historical authorityÙwUse for contemporary Kanto/plain-standard target; require overlays for dialect, period, subculture, or sacred registers”‘Ù+target_profile_selected_by_lowering_request’Ù'generic_flavor_without_target_selectionµmockery_or_stereotype­draft_guarded’µdense_dialect_markingÙ!identity_or_sacred_register_claim‚¨ellipsis”¨ellipsis©discourseÙZKanto Japanese may omit recoverable subjects or objects when discourse context supports it‘—½recoverable_argument_omission½recoverable argument omissionÙBAvoid over-explicit pronouns when referents are contextually clear’Ù*Would naming the subject sound translated?Ù1Would omission make the safety warning ambiguous?<EFBFBD><EFBFBD>‘Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.mdªpoliteness”ªpolitenessªpolitenessÙTJapanese lowering must choose plain/polite force and relation before surface wording‘—¯plain_vs_polite³plain versus politeÙ;Plain and desu/masu style change social relation and stance’Ù%What relation does the speaker claim?Ù5Does urgency justify plain imperative or prohibit it?<EFBFBD><EFBFBD>‘Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.md–‘œÙ*ja_kanto_plain_negative_imperative_warningÙ!Plain negative imperative warning¥draft“§grammar«clause_mood³negative_imperativeÙiUse plain negative imperative pressure for urgent warnings when relationship and scene permit directness.“®prevent_action¹plain_negative_imperative‘¬è§¦ã‚‹ã<EFBFBD>ªã€‚•’¸scene_has_immediate_riskplain_register_allowed‘Ù3polite_or_hierarchical_relation_requires_mitigationÂ¥light±reviewed_moderate–<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>”<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>–’Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.mdÙ(docs/cultural-ontology-meta-analysis.tex<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>¦medium’<EFBFBD>‘Ù5Seed feature; requires later corpus-backed expansion.“Ù*ja_kanto_plain_negative_imperative_warningÃÃ<EFBFBD><EFBFBD>‘œºja_kanto_argument_ellipsis½Recoverable argument ellipsis¥draft“©discourseµinformation_structure±argument_omissionÙwOmit recoverable subjects or objects when this preserves natural Kanto/standard Japanese flow without losing referents.“´avoid_translationese¹omit_recoverable_argument‘¾å<EFBFBD>±ã<EFBFBD>ªã<EFBFBD>„。触らã<EFBFBD>ªã<EFBFBD>„ã<EFBFBD>§ã€‚•‘¾referent_is_contextually_clear‘Ù&safety_referent_would_become_ambiguousÂ¥light±reviewed_moderate–<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>”<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>–’Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.mdÙ(docs/cultural-ontology-meta-analysis.tex<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>¦medium’<EFBFBD>‘Ù5Seed feature; requires later corpus-backed expansion.“ºja_kanto_argument_ellipsisÃÑœ½ja_kanto_mixed_script_default´Mixed-script default¥draft“«orthography­script_choice°kanji_kana_mixedÙyUse ordinary contemporary mixed kanji/kana orthography; do not force kana-only or historical spelling without an overlay.“»preserve_modern_readability¼modern_japanese_mixed_script‘Ù-壊れã<EFBFBD>Ÿåˆå¾¡è£…ç½®ã<EFBFBD>«ã<EFBFBD>¯è§¦ã‚‰ã<EFBFBD>ªã<EFBFBD>„ã<EFBFBD>§ã€‚•’target_locale_is_ja_JPperiod_is_contemporary‘Ù(historical_or_child_voice_overlay_activeÂ¥light±reviewed_moderate–<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>”<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>–’Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.mdÙ(docs/cultural-ontology-meta-analysis.tex<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>¦medium’<EFBFBD>‘Ù5Seed feature; requires later corpus-backed expansion.“½ja_kanto_mixed_script_defaultÃÓÂ<EFBFBD><EFBFBD>•¥light±reviewed_moderate¥light’®broad_audience¥local”¥plain¦polite¯technical_plain®urgent_warning“Ù>Do not treat Kanto Japanese as all Japanese dialect diversity.ÙHDo not import Kansai particles or historical archaism into this profile.ÙJDo not overuse pronouns because English source text had explicit subjects.–’Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.mdÙ(docs/cultural-ontology-meta-analysis.tex<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>¦medium•±activated_profile©axes_used­features_used±features_rejected±reviewer_required”Ù2weksa.cultural_ontology.pt-BR.vanilla_brazilian.v0¿weksa.cultural_ontology.profile´2026-06-09T15:56:17ZÅ
£ÜÙ"weksa.cultural_ontology_profile.v0Ù2weksa.cultural_ontology.pt-BR.vanilla_brazilian.v0­base_language­draft_guarded–¢pt¥pt-BR¤Latn¼vanilla Brazilian Portuguese‘´portugues brasileiro‘´Brazilian Portuguese‘Ù'weksa.target_cultural_ontology.pt-BR.v0Ù®Broad Brazilian Portuguese lowering target for neutral contemporary dialogue. Regional, class, religious, and community registers are overlays, not part of this vanilla base.’”Ù$salience axes for utterance loweringÙ"activation and forbidden-use gatesÙ$nested linguistic affordance records¿evidence and trace requirements”®source meaning°speaker identityÙ+final wording without an interlingua packet¹whole-culture description•‘¦BrazilÙ0Broad contemporary Brazilian Portuguese audienceÙBContemporary national pt-BR baseline for reviewed fixture dialogueÙ8Does not claim regional or religious-community authorityÙaUse for broad target-language lowering; require overlays for region or sacred/community registers”‘Ù+target_profile_selected_by_lowering_request’Ù'generic_flavor_without_target_selectionµmockery_or_stereotype­draft_guarded’µdense_dialect_markingÙ!identity_or_sacred_register_claim‚ªdirectness”ªdirectness¦stanceÙ%Warning force and mitigation pressure‘—®urgent_warning®urgent warningÙHDirect warning can preserve safety pressure when source intent is urgent’¾Does mitigation erase urgency?Ù-Does bare imperative falsely imply hierarchy?<EFBFBD><EFBFBD>‘Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.md©treatment”©treatment¯social_relationÙBBrazilian Portuguese addressee treatment and address form pressure‘—¬voce_default¬voce defaultÙQBroad pt-BR second-person treatment when no regional tu/senhor pressure is active’ÙDIs the relation familiar, hierarchical, hostile, sacred, or unknown?Ù.Would senhor/senhora be more honest than voce?<EFBFBD><EFBFBD>‘Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.md–‘œ´pt_br_voce_treatmentVoce treatment default¥draft“§grammar§pronoun·second_person_treatmentÙPUse broad pt-BR voce treatment where a neutral second-person relation is needed.“¾select_second_person_treatmentÙ#voce_or_null_subject_with_agreement‘Ù!Nao toque no controle danificado.•’target_locale_is_pt_BR½no_regional_tu_overlay_active‘Ù1explicit_formal_hierarchy_requires_senhor_senhoraÂ¥light±reviewed_moderate–<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>”<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>–’Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.mdÙ(docs/cultural-ontology-meta-analysis.tex<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>¦medium’<EFBFBD>‘Ù5Seed feature; requires later corpus-backed expansion.“´pt_br_voce_treatmentÃÃ<EFBFBD>‘œ¿pt_br_brazilian_lexical_default¹Brazilian lexical default¥draft“§lexicon®technical_term±locale_preferenceÙmPrefer Brazilian Portuguese lexical choices for ordinary technical dialogue unless an overlay says otherwise.“»preserve_locale_naturalness³choose_pt_BR_lexeme‘¨controle•‘target_locale_is_pt_BR‘Ù*european_portuguese_default_without_reasonÂ¥light±reviewed_moderate–<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>”<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>–’Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.mdÙ(docs/cultural-ontology-meta-analysis.tex<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>¦medium’<EFBFBD>‘Ù5Seed feature; requires later corpus-backed expansion.“¿pt_br_brazilian_lexical_defaultÃÃ<EFBFBD><EFBFBD>“Â<EFBFBD><EFBFBD>•¥light±reviewed_moderate¥light’®broad_audience¥local“°neutral_dialogue¬casual_clear¯technical_plain“ÙBDo not treat pt-BR as European Portuguese with different spelling.ÙRDo not fold Rio, Minas, Sao Paulo, Umbanda, class, or race into vanilla Brazilian.ÙHDo not soften warnings merely because English review expects politeness.–’Ù$schemas/cultural-ontology-profile.mdÙ(docs/cultural-ontology-meta-analysis.tex<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>¦medium•±activated_profile©axes_used­features_used±features_rejected±reviewer_required