State the open consent gap truthfully: frame:3 is live in the inventories
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
dac67cebb7
commit
eb258cfa4f
1 changed files with 8 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -197,8 +197,14 @@ whatever the inventory grows). This is source-side communicative pressure, not
|
|||
target-language register. `addressee_consent` is no feature: it names the
|
||||
predication the addressee asked for or agreed to, a fact about what the
|
||||
addressee did. `V14` and `V15` check the field: it may be set only by authoring or game
|
||||
telemetry, and it must name a predication of the packet. Nothing lowers a
|
||||
request clause from it today (follow-up `table-retirement-consent-owner`).
|
||||
telemetry, and it must name a predication of the packet. Open gap: `frame:3`
|
||||
(`request_intervention`) is in the committed inventories (`data/interlingua`,
|
||||
`data/original`, `data/daodejing`) and seeded at `inventory.rs:518`. No
|
||||
committed packet uses it, but the encoder sees it, and `V14` and `V15` check only
|
||||
the consent field, so a model-encoded `frame:3` predication with a null
|
||||
`addressee_consent` reaches `Prompt::lower` and nothing refuses it. The retired
|
||||
gate covered only the deleted `lower()`. Follow-up
|
||||
`table-retirement-consent-owner` owns the gap.
|
||||
|
||||
### `stance`
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue