Define flavored English lowering target
This commit is contained in:
parent
4ba46dfb0f
commit
2e941e409c
7 changed files with 391 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ objective:
|
|||
Create a durable workspace where Weksa can develop from a persistent map
|
||||
before runtime architecture decisions are made.
|
||||
current: >
|
||||
Define the Weksa interlingua standard as the shared meaning contract across
|
||||
current and future setting clients.
|
||||
Define the first lowering target: project interlingua through character
|
||||
agent state into flavored English dialogue and AquaSynth speech intent.
|
||||
|
||||
constraints:
|
||||
- Runtime implementation language is undecided.
|
||||
|
|
@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ constraints:
|
|||
- The interlingua must stay language-neutral. Setting-specific pressure starts
|
||||
in namespaced extensions and only becomes standard when multiple clients or
|
||||
language projects need it.
|
||||
- Flavored English is the first lowering target. Alien-language lowering waits
|
||||
until Weksa can preserve meaning through a character voice humans can judge.
|
||||
- Agent state is projected context, not prompt prose storage. Raw state
|
||||
internals must not leak into generated dialogue.
|
||||
|
||||
invariants:
|
||||
- Ontology owns meaning.
|
||||
|
|
@ -55,6 +59,9 @@ data_flow:
|
|||
- existing language project state
|
||||
process:
|
||||
- accept or decompose source into a Weksa interlingua packet
|
||||
- optionally project the packet through an agent-local state context
|
||||
- lower projected meaning into flavored English dialogue
|
||||
- emit AquaSynth phonetic intent request for speech synthesis
|
||||
- apply alien ontology and cultural salience
|
||||
- select grammatical commitments
|
||||
- derive morphology and lexical families
|
||||
|
|
@ -142,6 +149,10 @@ accepted_design:
|
|||
- The interlingua packet is the client-facing meaning contract. It owns
|
||||
referents, predications, relations, discourse, context, provenance,
|
||||
constraints, extensions, and trace data before ontology projection.
|
||||
- English lowering through agent state is the first proof target before alien
|
||||
language rendering.
|
||||
- Nibu is the first target for flavored-English lowering, using her VoidBot
|
||||
state and Aetheria lore note as source context.
|
||||
- Weksa is the engine. A language project owns one constructed language.
|
||||
Setting docs own story, species, culture, and use cases.
|
||||
- Rust to Dust is an earlier proving ground, not engine doctrine.
|
||||
|
|
@ -178,6 +189,10 @@ open_questions:
|
|||
ecological memory networks, and mobile family-unit civilizations?
|
||||
- Which interlingua fields should be promoted from namespaced extensions after
|
||||
the first real Zyphos and Rust to Dust packets?
|
||||
- What exact projected-context subset should Weksa accept from Ghostlight-style
|
||||
agent state for English lowering?
|
||||
- How much phonetic intent should Weksa emit directly versus requesting from
|
||||
AquaSynth after dialogue text exists?
|
||||
|
||||
landed_baseline:
|
||||
- Language-neutral state spine.
|
||||
|
|
@ -188,3 +203,5 @@ landed_baseline:
|
|||
- Eusocial Interbeing naming surface at settings/eusocial-interbeing.
|
||||
- Zyphos language-design pressure note.
|
||||
- Draft Weksa interlingua standard and packet schema receipt.
|
||||
- Draft flavored-English lowering contract.
|
||||
- Nibu lowering target note.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue