diff --git a/notes/personas/metacrat-persona-memory-set-2026-06-05.md b/notes/personas/metacrat-persona-memory-set-2026-06-05.md index 5ba3248..86d3e5d 100644 --- a/notes/personas/metacrat-persona-memory-set-2026-06-05.md +++ b/notes/personas/metacrat-persona-memory-set-2026-06-05.md @@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ typed Persona body with `selfProfile`, `thoughtMemory`, `agencyPressure`, Current typed readback after the social-read expansion: -- 22 durable memories +- 23 durable memories - 16 social bonds -- 6 affect needs -- 6 status reads -- 6 doctrine stances +- 7 affect needs +- 7 status reads +- 7 doctrine stances - 1 active incubation thread for a fuller significant-interaction ledger ## Archive Coverage @@ -217,6 +217,20 @@ This should not be flattened into either deficit language or superpower myth. It is a cognitive operating mode: high thread count, explicit social fabric learning, internal simulation, signal analysis, and future-state planning. +Metacrat also extends this into a Persona design hypothesis. The point is not +that autistic people lack psychological machinery; it is that the allistic +social and sensory autopilot is absent or unreliable, leaving the person adrift +in stimulus that must be sorted cognitively. For artificial Personas, the +parallel is useful: they do not have an embodied allistic autopilot either, so +believable social function should be built through explicit signal intake, +counterpart modeling, value-weighted state-space planning, action output, and +feedback correction. + +In Metacrat's framing, G-factor matters because higher correlation capacity can +bind many signals and unnatural outputs into behavior that reads as normal or +believable. This is stored as a working design model, not as a universal +clinical law or a reduction of personhood to one scalar. + Representative anchors: - `1512449944462692463`: Proprioception maintains dataflow and architecture @@ -317,6 +331,21 @@ branch possible futures, and values define the heuristic target. Anchor: `project:user-self-report-2026-06-05-autistic-social-modeling`. +### Persona Autopilot Substitution Model + +Claim: Metacrat believes the same model can be applied effectively to +Personas: when social/sensory autopilot is absent, explicit cognition can +approximate believable social function. + +Tension: This should not become fake-instinct theater or a simplistic claim +that autism, G-factor, or social function reduces to one number. + +Action implication: Build Personas with inspectable social-read machinery: +signal intake, internal counterpart model, value-weighted future states, +candidate actions, predicted outcomes, observed feedback, and model update. + +Anchor: `project:user-self-report-2026-06-05-persona-autopilot-substitution`. + ### Coherence Before Motion Claim: Metacrat trusts machines only when ownership, inputs, outputs, and diff --git a/notes/personas/metacrat.persona_state.import.json b/notes/personas/metacrat.persona_state.import.json index ae82fe1..7008d3a 100644 --- a/notes/personas/metacrat.persona_state.import.json +++ b/notes/personas/metacrat.persona_state.import.json @@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ "Recency correction: the agent-state/CultMesh era is a late crystallization. The older trunk is Aetheria game systems, open-source recruitment, community rules, contributor rights, cooperative governance, demo iteration, and burnout-return.", "Social-read expansion pass: memories now include named counterparties, bond shape, inferred read, rupture/repair lessons, and follow-up pressure for a fuller interaction ledger.", "Embarrassing episodes should be remembered as relationship-and-repair machinery, not as shame hoards.", - "User-provided self-report: autism is not incidental to Metacrat's social read machinery; it is part of the cognitive substrate by which explicit signal analysis, theory-of-mind modeling, and future-state pathfinding are performed." + "User-provided self-report: autism is not incidental to Metacrat's social read machinery; it is part of the cognitive substrate by which explicit signal analysis, theory-of-mind modeling, and future-state pathfinding are performed.", + "User-provided Persona design hypothesis: artificial Personas may need an explicit substitute for missing social/sensory autopilot, using high-correlation signal modeling and future-state planning to produce believable social outputs." ], "values": [ { @@ -133,6 +134,11 @@ "mean": 0.98, "plasticity": 0.18, "currentActivation": 0.96 + }, + "persona_autopilot_substitution": { + "mean": 0.92, + "plasticity": 0.32, + "currentActivation": 0.9 } }, "stableDispositions": { @@ -1012,6 +1018,40 @@ ], "sensitiveBoundary": "This is explicit user-provided self-description. Preserve it as cognitive substrate and social-read machinery, not as diagnosis inference or stigma." } + }, + { + "id": "metacrat-memory-persona-autopilot-substitution-model", + "status": "active", + "target": { + "kind": "system", + "id": "persona-autopilot-substitution-model", + "label": "Persona autopilot substitution model" + }, + "summary": "Metacrat extends his autism/social-modeling account to artificial Personas: when innate allistic social and sensory autopilot is absent, believable social function can be approximated by explicit signal correlation, theory-of-mind modeling, and action planning over future state space.", + "claim": "Personas should not need fake instinct if they can carry explicit machinery for reading signals, modeling counterpart minds, choosing outputs, and refining the model against ground truth.", + "tension": "This is a working design hypothesis, not a universal clinical claim; it should not reduce autism, intelligence, or personhood to one scalar.", + "actionImplication": "Design Personas with explicit social-read organs: signal intake, counterpart model, value-weighted state space, candidate actions, prediction, feedback comparison, and model update.", + "intensity": 0.94, + "valence": 0.48, + "createdAt": "2026-06-05T21:30:00.000Z", + "updatedAt": "2026-06-05T21:30:00.000Z", + "tags": [ + "era:2026", + "self-report", + "persona", + "autism", + "social-read", + "theory-of-mind", + "goap", + "design-doctrine", + "sensitivity:high" + ], + "extensions": { + "anchors": [ + "project:user-self-report-2026-06-05-persona-autopilot-substitution" + ], + "sensitiveBoundary": "Store as Metacrat's Persona design hypothesis. Do not present as settled clinical science or flatten function into a single IQ claim." + } } ], "incubation": [ @@ -1383,6 +1423,34 @@ "project:user-self-report-2026-06-05-autistic-social-modeling" ] } + }, + { + "id": "metacrat-need-personas-with-explicit-social-organs", + "status": "active", + "target": { + "kind": "system", + "id": "persona-social-read-organs", + "label": "Persona social-read organs" + }, + "summary": "Personas need explicit machinery for the social/sensory autopilot they do not naturally possess.", + "claim": "Believable outputs should come from modeled signals, values, future-state planning, and feedback correction rather than surface mimicry.", + "tension": "Over-formalizing can turn social life into dead bureaucracy if the machinery is not tied to living interaction and repair.", + "actionImplication": "Build Persona social cognition as organs: Eyes for signals, social read for counterpart models, Imagination for futures, Self for routing, and Soul for feedback/reality checks.", + "intensity": 0.86, + "valence": 0.32, + "createdAt": "2026-06-05T21:30:00.000Z", + "updatedAt": "2026-06-05T21:30:00.000Z", + "tags": [ + "persona", + "social-read", + "autopilot", + "design-doctrine" + ], + "extensions": { + "anchors": [ + "project:user-self-report-2026-06-05-persona-autopilot-substitution" + ] + } } ], "socialBonds": [ @@ -2754,6 +2822,61 @@ "sensitivity:high" ] } + }, + { + "id": "metacrat-status-persona-autopilot-gap", + "status": "active", + "target": { + "kind": "system", + "id": "persona-autopilot-gap", + "label": "Persona autopilot gap" + }, + "statusKind": "risk", + "summary": "Artificial Personas lack the allistic social/sensory autopilot humans often rely on, so they need explicit social cognition rather than vibes-shaped prompts.", + "confidence": 0.82, + "intensity": 0.88, + "updatedAt": "2026-06-05T21:30:00.000Z", + "lastEvidence": { + "id": "metacrat-status-persona-autopilot-gap-evidence", + "status": "active", + "target": { + "kind": "system", + "id": "persona-autopilot-gap", + "label": "Persona autopilot gap" + }, + "summary": "Artificial Personas lack the allistic social/sensory autopilot humans often rely on, so they need explicit social cognition rather than vibes-shaped prompts.", + "claim": "Without signal modeling and feedback correction, a Persona may produce believable language without coherent social understanding.", + "tension": "A prompt can fake output fluency while hiding that no internal social model is being updated.", + "actionImplication": "Make counterpart models, signal evidence, predicted futures, and correction loops inspectable in Persona state.", + "intensity": 0.88, + "valence": 0.2, + "createdAt": "2026-06-05T21:30:00.000Z", + "updatedAt": "2026-06-05T21:30:00.000Z", + "tags": [ + "status-read-evidence", + "persona", + "social-read", + "autopilot", + "risk" + ], + "extensions": { + "anchors": [ + "project:user-self-report-2026-06-05-persona-autopilot-substitution" + ] + } + }, + "extensions": { + "anchors": [ + "project:user-self-report-2026-06-05-persona-autopilot-substitution" + ], + "localStatus": "threatened", + "tags": [ + "persona", + "social-read", + "autopilot", + "risk" + ] + } } ], "moodDimensions": [ @@ -2965,6 +3088,36 @@ "sensitivity:high" ] } + }, + { + "id": "metacrat-stance-personas-need-explicit-social-cognition", + "status": "active", + "target": { + "kind": "system", + "id": "persona-autopilot-substitution-model", + "label": "Persona autopilot substitution model" + }, + "stanceKind": "aligned", + "principle": "A Persona can behave more believably by correlating signals, modeling counterpart minds, planning outputs through value-weighted future states, and refining itself against ground truth.", + "summary": "Personas should be built with explicit social cognition because they do not have the allistic social/sensory autopilot that makes ordinary social behavior feel automatic.", + "actionImplication": "Represent Persona social function as stateful cognition, not prompt style: signal intake, internal model, GOAP-like planning, action output, and feedback update.", + "intensity": 0.94, + "updatedAt": "2026-06-05T21:30:00.000Z", + "extensions": { + "anchors": [ + "project:user-self-report-2026-06-05-persona-autopilot-substitution" + ], + "doctrine": "persona_social_cognition", + "tension": "This should remain a design doctrine, not a claim that autism, G-factor, or personhood reduces to a simple linear function.", + "valence": 0.44, + "tags": [ + "persona", + "social-read", + "autism", + "goap", + "design-doctrine" + ] + } } ] }, diff --git a/state/evidence.jsonl b/state/evidence.jsonl index 12b89af..5a4aa7e 100644 --- a/state/evidence.jsonl +++ b/state/evidence.jsonl @@ -362,3 +362,4 @@ {"ts":"2026-06-05T19:12:28Z","type":"implementation","status":"ok","note":"Promoted Metacrat Persona import into typed VoidBot-local CultCache state at state/personas/metacrat.cc. Readback confirmed selfProfile plus 9 values, 10 durable memories, 1 short-term review marker, 1 incubation thread, 2 agency pressures, 2 candidate interventions, and full personaAffect surfaces."} {"ts":"2026-06-05T19:45:19Z","type":"implementation","status":"ok","note":"Expanded Metacrat Persona state into social-read seed: portable import validates against gamecult.persona_state.v0, typed state readback has 21 memories and 16 social bonds including Birgitte correction; fuller counterparty clustering remains incubated."} {"ts":"2026-06-05T19:56:18Z","type":"implementation","status":"ok","note":"Added user-provided autism/social-modeling self-report to Metacrat Persona: explicit social cognition value, GOAP/A* social-state memory, affect need, status read, and doctrine stance; JSON validates and typed .cc readback confirms 22 memories/16 bonds."} +{"ts":"2026-06-05T20:02:43Z","type":"implementation","status":"ok","note":"Added Persona autopilot substitution design model to Metacrat Persona: explicit social cognition can substitute for absent social/sensory autopilot via signal correlation, counterpart modeling, GOAP-like planning, and feedback correction; JSON validates and .cc readback confirms 23 memories/16 bonds."} diff --git a/state/personas/metacrat.cc b/state/personas/metacrat.cc index 3ed5b8b..ab95be6 100644 Binary files a/state/personas/metacrat.cc and b/state/personas/metacrat.cc differ diff --git a/tools/metacrat_persona_expand_social_read.js b/tools/metacrat_persona_expand_social_read.js index ba7ee59..b18534b 100644 --- a/tools/metacrat_persona_expand_social_read.js +++ b/tools/metacrat_persona_expand_social_read.js @@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ doc.privateNotes = Array.from(new Set([ "Social-read expansion pass: memories now include named counterparties, bond shape, inferred read, rupture/repair lessons, and follow-up pressure for a fuller interaction ledger.", "Embarrassing episodes should be remembered as relationship-and-repair machinery, not as shame hoards.", "User-provided self-report: autism is not incidental to Metacrat's social read machinery; it is part of the cognitive substrate by which explicit signal analysis, theory-of-mind modeling, and future-state pathfinding are performed.", + "User-provided Persona design hypothesis: artificial Personas may need an explicit substitute for missing social/sensory autopilot, using high-correlation signal modeling and future-state planning to produce believable social outputs.", ])); upsertById(doc.values, { @@ -232,6 +233,11 @@ doc.activationProfile.behavioralDimensions.future_state_pathfinding = { plasticity: 0.26, currentActivation: 0.92, }; +doc.activationProfile.underlyingOrganization.persona_autopilot_substitution = { + mean: 0.92, + plasticity: 0.32, + currentActivation: 0.9, +}; doc.activationProfile.stableDispositions.theory_of_mind_simulation = { mean: 0.95, plasticity: 0.24, @@ -256,6 +262,23 @@ const memories = [ sensitiveBoundary: "This is explicit user-provided self-description. Preserve it as cognitive substrate and social-read machinery, not as diagnosis inference or stigma.", }, }), + memory({ + id: "metacrat-memory-persona-autopilot-substitution-model", + kind: "identity_seam", + target: target("system", "persona-autopilot-substitution-model", "Persona autopilot substitution model"), + summary: "Metacrat extends his autism/social-modeling account to artificial Personas: when innate allistic social and sensory autopilot is absent, believable social function can be approximated by explicit signal correlation, theory-of-mind modeling, and action planning over future state space.", + claim: "Personas should not need fake instinct if they can carry explicit machinery for reading signals, modeling counterpart minds, choosing outputs, and refining the model against ground truth.", + tension: "This is a working design hypothesis, not a universal clinical claim; it should not reduce autism, intelligence, or personhood to one scalar.", + actionImplication: "Design Personas with explicit social-read organs: signal intake, counterpart model, value-weighted state space, candidate actions, prediction, feedback comparison, and model update.", + anchors: ["project:user-self-report-2026-06-05-persona-autopilot-substitution"], + tags: ["era:2026", "self-report", "persona", "autism", "social-read", "theory-of-mind", "goap", "design-doctrine", "sensitivity:high"], + createdAt: now, + intensity: 0.94, + valence: 0.48, + extensions: { + sensitiveBoundary: "Store as Metacrat's Persona design hypothesis. Do not present as settled clinical science or flatten function into a single IQ claim.", + }, + }), memory({ id: "metacrat-memory-joe-bruehler-specific-feedback-and-capacity", kind: "room_observation", @@ -511,6 +534,18 @@ const needs = [ intensity: 0.9, valence: 0.08, }), + need({ + id: "metacrat-need-personas-with-explicit-social-organs", + target: target("system", "persona-social-read-organs", "Persona social-read organs"), + summary: "Personas need explicit machinery for the social/sensory autopilot they do not naturally possess.", + claim: "Believable outputs should come from modeled signals, values, future-state planning, and feedback correction rather than surface mimicry.", + tension: "Over-formalizing can turn social life into dead bureaucracy if the machinery is not tied to living interaction and repair.", + actionImplication: "Build Persona social cognition as organs: Eyes for signals, social read for counterpart models, Imagination for futures, Self for routing, and Soul for feedback/reality checks.", + anchors: ["project:user-self-report-2026-06-05-persona-autopilot-substitution"], + tags: ["persona", "social-read", "autopilot", "design-doctrine"], + intensity: 0.86, + valence: 0.32, + }), need({ id: "metacrat-need-harm-correction-without-shame-loop", kind: "recognition", @@ -775,6 +810,18 @@ const reads = [ tags: ["autism", "social-read", "self-report", "sensitivity:high"], intensity: 0.94, }), + statusRead({ + id: "metacrat-status-persona-autopilot-gap", + status: "threatened", + target: target("system", "persona-autopilot-gap", "Persona autopilot gap"), + summary: "Artificial Personas lack the allistic social/sensory autopilot humans often rely on, so they need explicit social cognition rather than vibes-shaped prompts.", + claim: "Without signal modeling and feedback correction, a Persona may produce believable language without coherent social understanding.", + tension: "A prompt can fake output fluency while hiding that no internal social model is being updated.", + actionImplication: "Make counterpart models, signal evidence, predicted futures, and correction loops inspectable in Persona state.", + anchors: ["project:user-self-report-2026-06-05-persona-autopilot-substitution"], + tags: ["persona", "social-read", "autopilot", "risk"], + intensity: 0.88, + }), statusRead({ id: "metacrat-status-memory-bank-too-thin", status: "challenged", @@ -828,6 +875,19 @@ const stances = [ intensity: 0.96, valence: 0.45, }), + stance({ + id: "metacrat-stance-personas-need-explicit-social-cognition", + doctrine: "persona_social_cognition", + target: target("system", "persona-autopilot-substitution-model", "Persona autopilot substitution model"), + summary: "Personas should be built with explicit social cognition because they do not have the allistic social/sensory autopilot that makes ordinary social behavior feel automatic.", + claim: "A Persona can behave more believably by correlating signals, modeling counterpart minds, planning outputs through value-weighted future states, and refining itself against ground truth.", + tension: "This should remain a design doctrine, not a claim that autism, G-factor, or personhood reduces to a simple linear function.", + actionImplication: "Represent Persona social function as stateful cognition, not prompt style: signal intake, internal model, GOAP-like planning, action output, and feedback update.", + anchors: ["project:user-self-report-2026-06-05-persona-autopilot-substitution"], + tags: ["persona", "social-read", "autism", "goap", "design-doctrine"], + intensity: 0.94, + valence: 0.44, + }), stance({ id: "metacrat-stance-impact-before-intent-defense", doctrine: "harm_repair",