Two rules Soul's follow-up pass falsified, both in admission.
A batch that derives a write could not be replayed. `derive` set every
derived sequence to `latest + 1` over an image that already held the first
admission's derived record, so the second admission produced a different
document, A8 refused it -- `AlreadyResolved` on the source side, and
`AlreadyStewarded` on the receiving one -- and A9 never saw the digest it
would have recognised. `derive` now reproduces the record it already made
when image or batch holds one, found by what the derivation writes into it: a
resolution `Answered` by this ruling, a withdrawal whose reason is this
hand-off's key, an assignment whose note is. The same document comes back
byte for byte, A9 answers with the first receipt, and only a batch that never
landed takes `latest + 1`.
A withdrawal could re-raise an earlier record over a later one, which is the
rationale Q19 A's cap rests on and the cap alone does not carry. Withdrawing
a resolution puts its subject back in force, so a repo handed away and handed
back could have the hand-off's withdrawal withdrawn and stand under two
assignments at once; a supersession withdrawn while the revision that
superseded it stood left two revisions in force, which is what the finding
rule reads for its invariant vocabulary. `WouldReinstateOverLater` refuses
that: the record the withdrawal would reinstate, against anything in force
and later in the scope that record is sequenced in -- `(instance, repo)` for
a stewardship, the subject for a resolution, the campaign for a target and
the cut for a cut spec.
Four tests, one per fix and kind: the ruling's resolution and both sides of a
hand-off replayed to `AlreadyAdmitted` with the first receipt and no second
receipt in the store; the retaken repo and the superseded revision refused,
with the later record still the only one in force.
Four more tests for rules the code already held and the suite could not tell
from weaker ones: a sequence gap refuses on both sequenced kinds rather than
only a taken sequence; the latest sequence counts the batch as well as the
image; the Q19 cap reads a chain landing in one batch; and the hand-off's
second withdrawal of one assignment takes the next sequence, not `1`.
41 tests, 0 warnings.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
f566fe6bb3