The pin moves to Epiphany `5cda0886`, where `PipelineRef::validate_ref` opens
the leaf's grammar to a reader. `view` and `history`'s subject scope ask it
before they look, so a ref whose kind and id disagree is refused instead of
reporting the nothing a lookup finds. `query`'s `campaign`, `cut` and `repo`
filters take a `Slug`, a `Label` and an `OrgRepo`, not refs, and are unchanged.
The refusal is `MindRefusal::Document`, the leaf's `InvalidFormat` wrapped
where the organ already wraps the leaf's four. A new variant would be a second
name for one rule, and the grammar it names lives in the leaf.
`a_ref_whose_kind_and_id_disagree_is_refused_by_both_doors` pins both doors on
a disagreeing kind and on a local no writer composes, and pins that absence is
still absence: a well-formed id of a document this mind does not hold answers
`None` and an empty history as it always did. The history test's malformed
scope asserts the refusal where it asserted an empty answer.
`V24` and `V24L` in `tools/eureka-cut9-mutations.psd1` are the validation
dropped and the validation applied at `view` alone. `V10L` leaves the suite
with its reason in the header: a subject compared by `id` alone can no longer
differ from one compared whole, since both sides' kind is now a function of
the id, so the weakening is unreachable and a mutation that cannot fail is not
a proof.
`cargo test -p huginn-mind --lib` 57 passed, 0 warnings; `cargo check
--workspace` clean; Cut 8 and Cut 9 suites green-and-killed through the
harness. The lock moves the one pin.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5ba7b0c6e5