Record v30 manual regather boundary
This commit is contained in:
parent
47689dfa1e
commit
1fe8494ec1
3 changed files with 40 additions and 7 deletions
|
|
@ -102,10 +102,43 @@ derived `regatherManually`, and launches only the fixed Research lane; it fails
|
|||
closed for any other Self action. All fifteen coordinator tests pass. It is not
|
||||
yet packaged or replayed.
|
||||
|
||||
Exact pushed `47689dfa1e72e41d89477daf34c57b39fcc114cb` packaged all
|
||||
21 binaries in 16m00s as
|
||||
`sha256-6a133ffda55cb92710fe5ac7798e70b0ac44faf2670282c524dde76655b81060`
|
||||
with witness
|
||||
`sha256-22d0828dcc5bf0bdf61389f96e8e21ea1a20087c768d8c006b8aa5bf5c04e7b7`.
|
||||
Clean v30 lives at
|
||||
`F:\Projects\.epiphany-runtime\shakedown\live-20260807-v30`; only canonical
|
||||
`agents.cc` crossed from v29. Repository Body, runtime, coverage, local Verse,
|
||||
and release stores were freshly bootstrapped and physically separated.
|
||||
|
||||
The v30 model-only thread is `shakedown-v30-native-chain-r1`. It proved a
|
||||
malformed native RepoModel patch cannot cross Mind: the first result omitted
|
||||
three required anchors and was durably superseded. A second result was accepted.
|
||||
Typed proposal `shakedown-v30-continuity-seam-proposal-2` then bound exact
|
||||
payload `2d4cc6d6328b6abd036cf5b4fb3f5f932040ff4ce49b6e1ef5e0d397d6ffb2e8`
|
||||
to Modeling request
|
||||
`repo-frontier-proposal-modeling-765bd382828d753aa08ec347038c89a0f2a01c9fc1b34780ef62bf90872cda4b`.
|
||||
The live chain accepted proposal-bound Modeling, Eyes, Reorientation, and
|
||||
causal Modeling. Self derived `regatherManually` at revision 13. The packaged
|
||||
`--approve-manual-regather` surface converted that exact action into one fixed
|
||||
Eyes launch, which was accepted and causally consumed by Modeling. The consent
|
||||
was not reused and did not become persistent routing authority.
|
||||
|
||||
After post-consent Modeling acceptance at revision 17, Self again derived
|
||||
`regatherManually`. Both accepted source passes agree on the same missing Body
|
||||
path: the repository proves job opening, failed/cancelled snapshot
|
||||
interpretation, and acceptance prerequisites, but not the concrete terminal
|
||||
worker writer or an automatic rupture-to-completed-Reorientation/Verification
|
||||
closure. The authoritative thread objective is explicitly model-only and
|
||||
forbids repository changes, so this is its proper stopping boundary, not a
|
||||
reason for another Eyes loop.
|
||||
|
||||
## Next action
|
||||
|
||||
Package the bounded manual-regather consent surface into a clean successor,
|
||||
approve the current Self-derived boundary once, then prove:
|
||||
Open a new typed implementation objective for the admitted rupture-to-closure
|
||||
gap. Do not approve manual regather again on the completed model-only thread.
|
||||
Route the gap through canonical Imagination and dedicated Mind, then prove:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Self derives proposal-bound Modeling and canonical Imagination.
|
||||
2. Self selects and launches canonical Imagination.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Binary file not shown.
|
|
@ -34,15 +34,15 @@ invariants:
|
|||
- Evidence and git retain history; this map retains only state that changes future decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
current_status:
|
||||
summary: Epiphany is a supervised engineering alpha on Starfire, not deployment-ready. Exact f9dfd93a packages all 21 shipped binaries through one frozen release-bundle graph in 16m38s and is published only into clean v29; v28 remains sealed Continuity failure evidence. v29 natively proved proposal-bound Modeling, Eyes, Reorientation, the single-use Research-to-Modeling route, and typed acceptance boundaries. After causal Modeling acceptance, Self correctly derived regatherManually because the concrete failure-to-continuity-receipt-to-restart seam remained uninspected, but the coordinator exposed no typed operator control to enact that manual Eyes handoff. The worktree now adds a single-use --approve-manual-regather consent surface valid only over Self-derived regatherManually; all 15 coordinator tests pass. Exact packaging/replay, Imagination-to-Mind, Hands, failure/restart closure, Persona consequence, retention, endurance, and Linux/Yggdrasil cognition remain open.
|
||||
summary: Epiphany is a supervised engineering alpha on Starfire, not deployment-ready. Exact 47689dfa packages all 21 shipped binaries through one frozen release-bundle graph in 16m00s and is published only into clean v30; v28 and v29 remain sealed evidence. v30 natively proved malformed RepoModel rejection and supersession, valid Modeling admission, typed frontier selection, proposal-bound Modeling, Eyes, Reorientation, causal Research-to-Modeling routing, and the packaged single-use manual-regather consent. After the one consented Eyes turn and its causal Modeling acceptance, Self again derived regatherManually because source inspection still found no concrete terminal worker writer or rupture-to-Reorientation/Verification closure path. The model-only objective has reached its authority boundary; another Eyes loop is not warranted. Canonical Imagination, dedicated Mind adoption, Hands, deliberate failure/restart closure, Persona consequence, retention, endurance, and Linux/Yggdrasil cognition remain open.
|
||||
operational_state:
|
||||
local_worktree: manual_regather_consent_awaiting_package
|
||||
local_worktree: clean_at_pushed_47689dfa
|
||||
operator_wireguard: restored
|
||||
yggdrasil: canonical_small_public_crossing_body
|
||||
starfire: temporary_epiphany_cognition_body
|
||||
starfire_runtime_identity: epiphany-starfire
|
||||
starfire_swarm_brake: released
|
||||
starfire_release: authenticated_f9dfd93a_published_v29_release_bundle_proven
|
||||
starfire_release: authenticated_47689dfa_published_v30_release_bundle_proven
|
||||
starfire_repository_body: bound_and_observed
|
||||
starfire_verse_topology: bound_to_current_repository_body
|
||||
starfire_native_status: supervised_shakedown_active
|
||||
|
|
@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ current_status:
|
|||
bifrost_feedback_crossing: authenticated_transport_only
|
||||
yggdrasil_epiphany_services: absent
|
||||
resident_physiology: heartbeat_and_self_running
|
||||
unresolved_authority: v29 proved native proposal Modeling, Eyes regather, Reorientation, and causal Modeling, then exposed a missing operator actuator at the intentional regatherManually boundary. The bounded consent surface passes tests but needs exact package/replay. Canonical Imagination, dedicated Mind adoption, exact adopted-plan Hands binding, deliberate worker failure/restart/closure, Persona consequence, retention, endurance, and Linux/Yggdrasil cognition remain open.
|
||||
next_action: Commit, package, and publish the manual-regather consent surface into a clean successor generation; approve the Self-derived boundary once, accept targeted Eyes evidence, and continue through Modeling, canonical Imagination, Mind adoption, Hands, and deliberate failure/restart/Soul closure.
|
||||
unresolved_authority: v30 proved the manual-regather actuator exactly once and proved it does not persist as ambient routing authority. The consented Eyes-to-Modeling pass still found no source-proven terminal worker writer or automatic rupture-to-continuity/Soul closure path, and Self returned to regatherManually. The current model-only thread cannot lawfully enter Imagination or Hands. Canonical Imagination, dedicated Mind adoption, exact adopted-plan Hands binding, deliberate worker failure/restart/closure, Persona consequence, retention, endurance, and Linux/Yggdrasil cognition remain open.
|
||||
next_action: Open a new typed implementation objective for the missing rupture-to-closure path. Route the admitted absence through canonical Imagination and dedicated Mind before Hands; then deliberately fail one bounded worker and prove terminal failure, restart/recovery, and Soul-verifiable closure. Do not approve manual regather again on the completed model-only thread.
|
||||
|
||||
active_subgoals:
|
||||
- Prove Persona, Self, Eyes, Modeling, Imagination, Hands, Soul, Mind, Continuity, and nervous-system behavior individually.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Reference in a new issue