Separate metrics accounting and review evidence
This commit is contained in:
parent
4dde747ee8
commit
1f5f8d1d64
10 changed files with 51 additions and 15 deletions
|
|
@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
|
|||
- Deployment requests split Self routing from independent Maintainer/Soul/Mind/Bifrost review and Idunn-only execution. Maintainer review cannot impersonate Idunn deployment; only Idunn deployment and aftercare receipts prove outcomes.
|
||||
- PR requests split Self routing, Bifrost publication gating, Hands execution, and GitHub provider outcomes. GitHub receipt authorship does not grant publication-policy authority.
|
||||
- Artifact acceptance requests split Self routing, Maintainer acceptance decisions, and Bifrost accounting. Acceptance receipts and accounting ledger rows no longer claim one composite owner.
|
||||
- Metrics requests split Self routing, Bifrost accounting custody, and Maintainer review-load evidence. Spend/review receipts are observations and grant no spend or ledger authority.
|
||||
- `repo.planning_brief` is deleted. It contained no candidate work-item records and let copied global catalog/schema/closure constants self-attest as per-item planning and readiness evidence. The live preparation chain is consensus draft -> interpretation request -> objective draft -> Mind adoption.
|
||||
- There is no aggregate repo-swarm MVP gate. The former smoke manually aggregated fixture summaries into green rows and `demoReady=true`; it and its wrapper are deleted. Whole-organism readiness requires a live-fire path whose claimed consequences are observed at their owning boundaries.
|
||||
- Persona owner: `collaboration-feedback` writes public, bounded feedback only after that provider receipt exists.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Reference in a new issue