Commit graph CultLib/tests/GameCult.Caching.Tests/ConditionalCommitTests.cs
Author SHA1 Message Date
Meta Vens
bcae4839d0 Deliver each cache's changes in save order
The outermost hold takes a ticket under the gate and, after releasing it,
waits on a per-cache delivery gate for its turn, delivers, then advances
the turn. Delivery order across threads equals admission order. A hold
closed while its thread is delivering queues its ticket behind that
delivery on the same thread instead of waiting, so an observer writing
the cache cannot deadlock against a writer: a waiting thread holds no gate
and no turn, and a turn holder never waits.

Hand-over-hand from the gate to a delivery lock was rejected: a writer
blocked on the delivery lock while holding the gate deadlocks with an
observer that writes the same cache.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-13 20:09:23 +02:00
Meta Vens
b653f68f81 Route every admitting gate entry through a hold
FlushAllBackingStores and Dispose take the gate through Held, so a store
method that loads can never reach Admit under a plain lock; Admit outside
a hold throws a clear InvalidOperationException. Entering a cache's hold
inside another cache's hold throws. PullAllBackingStoresAsync pulls every
store even when an OnUpdate handler throws, then rethrows. The dead Try
around Subject.OnNext is gone: R3 never throws there, so only OnUpdate
exceptions reach the caller. Repull tests wait for the writer to start
before their bounded wait.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-13 20:01:36 +02:00
Meta Vens
544c087cf1 Publish each hold's own changes to its own caller
The cache-wide unpublished list let any thread drain and deliver another
thread's changes: a throwing observer dropped the rest of the queue and threw
into an unrelated writer, writes returned before their change was published,
and a third-party load could wait indefinitely.

Every admission now runs in a hold (Held). The outermost hold on a thread
collects exactly the changes it admits and publishes them after it leaves the
gate, before it returns, on its caller's thread; nested holds append to it.
Every change is delivered even when an observer throws; the first exception
(AggregateException for several) is then rethrown, and a failing body's own
exception wins over observer exceptions.

Stores take the hold instead of locking a shared Gate object, so a direct
PullAll on an attached store publishes its own load and the empty follow-up
Loaded hand-over is gone. Gate is replaced by protected Held.

Tests: OwnChangeIsPublishedBeforeWriteReturns and
ThrowingObserverDoesNotLoseOtherChanges fail on 4eacd87 and pass here. The
repull tests now record a write that reaches the gate while the pull is paused
instead of inferring readiness from thread state; both fail when the pull does
not hold the gate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-13 19:46:18 +02:00
Meta Vens
4eacd876bf Publish observers after the gate, gate every store entry point, stamp under one hold
Observers and OnUpdate never run under the cache gate. Admit queues changes
while the gate is held; the outermost entry point (attach, pull, commit,
upsert, remove) publishes them after releasing it. A store's direct PullAll
hands over an empty load outside its lock so the cache publishes then.

A throwing observer can no longer split store from cache: publication starts
only after the store has adopted its loaded view. The directory store adopts
its durable catalog only after the cache admits the load; the write-only
_durableIndex is deleted.

Single-file Push, Delete, PushAll and CommitBatch take the gate like the
directory store; Dispose flushes under it. Write mints storedAt and admits
under one gate hold, and Land re-stamps staged upserts under the gate that
admits them, so a concurrent pull cannot land a later storedAt in between.

Tests: ObserverDoesNotRunUnderTheGate,
ThrowingOnUpdateHandlerDoesNotResurrectDeletedRecord,
RepullNeverErasesAStagedWriteOnDirectoryStore,
DirectCallsOnAnAttachedStoreShareTheCacheGate; the directory last-writer
result is pinned to {a,c,x}; the single-file re-pull test waits for the write
to reach the store or block instead of sleeping. Pausing tests always release
the pause so a failure cannot deadlock Dispose.

Docs: observer rule, direct store calls share the gate, directory TryCommit
contention and gate wait, per-key last-writer-wins, directory flush merge.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-13 19:23:44 +02:00
Meta Vens
5aad137e61 Share the cache gate with its stores and make unconditional commit last-writer-wins
An attached store takes its cache's gate as its own lock (CacheBackingStore.Gate),
so a pull's load callback into the cache can no longer take the gate after the
store lock. The directory store's private mutation gate is deleted; the
single-file pull now runs under the gate; PullAllBackingStoresAsync takes the
gate around each store's pull. Fixes the pull/upsert deadlock on directory
stores and the re-pull that erased a staged single-file write.

An unconditional single-file Commit writes the store's whole view plus the batch,
exactly as a flush would, instead of merging onto the file; it persists earlier
staged writes and leaves the store clean. Conditional commits still land onto
the file under the lock. Directory-store commit and flush already share one
generation writer (staged keys onto the current manifest) and are unchanged.

Contracts state both rules, the lock order, that OnUpdate fires for loads only,
that a missing single file keeps staged writes, and that a store failing to
hydrate on open throws and is left byte-identical.

Tests: PullAndUpsertOnDirectoryStoreDoNotDeadlock, RepullNeverErasesAStagedWrite,
UnconditionalCommitIsLastWriterWinsLikeFlush, UnconditionalCommitPersistsStagedWrites,
OpeningACorruptStoreThrowsAndLeavesItUntouched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-13 18:45:27 +02:00
Meta Vens
2a44209510 Refuse a key in two stores, stop reporting reader contention, prove lock waits and page order
F2: Validate refuses a write or load that would give a key already held by
one home store a second store; the message names the key and both stores and
nothing lands in either store or the cache.
F3: TryCommit enters the cache gate normally; only the store lock attempt is
non-blocking, so Contended means another writer holds the store.
F4: PushAll and Commit are shown to wait on a held <path>.lock; the race test
asserts mismatches occurred and that Task.WaitAll finished in time.
F5: a failed page write leaves the manifest bytes and the previous generation
intact.

Lock order (F1) and commit merge semantics (F6) are unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-13 18:21:19 +02:00
Meta Vens
a06d3f71f9 Prove conditional commit on single-file and directory stores
ConditionalCommitTests: StaleExpectFailsWithNothingChanged, ExpectNullIsCreateOnce,
PerEntryCommitSurvivesUnrelatedWrite, ExpectUnchangedFailsOnUnrelatedInsert,
TwoWritersRacingExactlyOneWins, TryCommitReportsContended,
PlainFlushNeverInterleaves, StoredAtIsStrictlyIncreasingPerKey,
DirtyStoreRefusesConditionalCommit, CrossStoreConditionalBatchThrowsBeforeAnyStore,
DirectoryStoreHonorsConditions (the four condition tests on a directory store).

The race is in-process: two store instances on one file, two threads, the
final count exactly 2 + 2N. The lock is a FileShare.None handle, which excludes
a second handle in this process exactly as in another, so the cross-process
TwoProcessesRacingExactlyOneWins and its console project are not added. Each
writer's mismatch is scripted before the free race, so "each writer reports at
least one mismatch" does not depend on scheduling.

PlainFlushNeverInterleaves counts an open that loses to a replace in flight as
no read; every read that gets bytes must deserialize.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-13 17:57:59 +02:00