Map publication Cut 4-6 on the journal (Imagination pass 4) and record Q-P5 A

Adds the pass 4 probes, the journal-floor rule, and the re-taken Cuts 4-6, salvage and ledger.
Records Q-P5 A: a primary that cannot log a committed change throws CultNetShardLogException.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Meta Vens 2026-09-29 23:34:42 +02:00
commit af7209a2c8

View file

@ -1,12 +1,10 @@
# CultCache publication: the cache owns "published once", and order stays data
Status, 2026-09-30: Cuts 1-2 landed on `main` at `2a1b8a8`, from `hands/cultcache-pub-c1c2` at `5fb3fca`.
Soul verdict: merge. Suites green: Caching 323, Networking 295, Mesh 262. Cut 3 is in Hands on
`hands/cultcache-pub-c3`, with Soul's Cuts 1-2 follow-ups folded in:
- F4: pin `Held`'s publish-on-throw guard. This is needed before Cut 4 relies on sequence density; Stryker could
not mutate `Held` (CS0165).
- F3: pin observer removal on unsubscribe.
- F1: the "getters run once" claim is false for conditional commits on variant stores.
Status, 2026-09-29: Cuts 1-3 landed on `main`. Cut 3 merged at `ae8576d`. Imagination pass 4 re-took Cuts 4-6
against `3bf1c0c`. Q-P5 is ruled (A). Cut 4 is ready for Hands.
- F4, pinning `Held`'s publish-on-throw guard, is done: Cut 3 pinned it.
- F3 (observer removal on unsubscribe) and F1 (the false "getters run once" claim for conditional commits on variant
stores) were Cut 3 follow-ups; confirm against the Cut 3 merge.
Recorded:
- F2, the Q-P2 hazard. A rethrown observer exception makes a committed write look cancelled or refused. The
@ -40,6 +38,8 @@ exactly once. This document owns the means.
the writer afterwards, and the observer stays subscribed. The commit stands.
- **Q-P3 A:** a public `CultCache.AddJournal(...)`, with reentry guarded.
- **Q-P4 A:** Cut 6, which drops stale changes per key on the wire, lands in this campaign.
- **Q-P5 A (2026-09-29):** a primary that cannot log a committed change throws a typed `CultNetShardLogException`
naming the shard and the burned sequence, after publication, not derived from `InvalidOperationException`.
## The finding that shapes this map
@ -113,6 +113,139 @@ throwaway worktree that no branch holds.
| Q7 | Soul's P2 shape: a handler waits 1 s for another thread's write | Observed in time. | Not observed in time. |
| Suites | Caching, Networking and Mesh | (green on main) | Caching fails `ObserverWritingTheSameCacheDoesNotWaitOnOtherDeliveries`, and Networking **hangs** until the 900 s idle kill. Rerun with `--blame-hang-timeout 90s`: 286 passed, then the test host hung and was dumped. The blame sequence file was not extracted, so **the hung test is not named**. It is consistent with, but not proven to be, `SubscriptionDemandHandlerWritingCacheDuringDeliveryDoesNotDeadlock`, whose own comment says "disposal would hang too". |
## Imagination pass 4: Cut 4 re-taken on the landed journal
Cut 3 landed at `ae8576d`. Its Soul left two questions that Cut 4 had to settle before relying on the
journal: (a) what a throwing journal means for the log, and (b) whether a journal needs the change's origin.
Both have one coherent answer. The one fork, Q-P5, was about who hears of a log failure; the operator ruled it A (2026-09-29).
### Probe evidence (pass 4)
- Probe file: `Pub4ProbeTests.cs` (Networking tests). It was run on Yggdrasil from scratch commits:
- `0d7397d`: main plus the probes;
- `6ec2f73`: the same, merged with the branch `28248eb`;
- `376cd74`: main plus probe C.
- The commits survive on the Yggdrasil mirror. The scratch worktree is gone.
- The probes report facts and assert nothing. `FlakyLogStore` is an in-memory `ICultNetShardMutationLogStore`
that can refuse `Append` or run a hook inside `GetCompactedThrough`.
| # | Probe | main `3bf1c0c` | branch `28248eb` (queue) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Primary with a durable log. Put 1, Put 2 (its `Append` throws), Put 3. A replica pulls, then retries. | Writer gets `IOException`. The cache holds 1, 2 and 3, but **2 is never published** (2 of 3). Memory log `[1,2,3]`, durable `[1,3]`. The replica pull throws "log has a gap. Expected 2, received 3", and so does **every retry**: the replica is stuck for good. | **Writer sees nothing**: R3 swallowed the drainer's exception. 2 is not published. The replica is stuck in the same way. |
| A2 | The same failure at the tail, then the primary restarts over the same cache and log store. | The replica applied 1. After restart, note 3 is **minted sequence 2**. The replica takes it, reports applied 2, and holds `1,3` against the primary's `1,2,3`: **silent divergence**, a reused sequence. | Same. |
| A3 | A replica whose log `Append` throws once. | The pull throws and the cursor stays at 0. The retry converges (`1,2`), but the memory log is `[1,1,2]`: a duplicate, because memory is written before disk and kept as a `List`. | The pull "succeeds": the exception was swallowed and the cursor went to 2. The durable log is `[2]`, so **entry 1 is lost**, and a chained replica sees a gap. |
| B1 | Primary with a file store. Another writer puts `pulled` into the file, the primary runs `PullAll`, and a replica pulls the log. | `pulled` is published but **not logged**. The replica gets nothing. | Logged. The replica converges on `pulled`. |
| B2 | A store attached after the database exists. | Nothing is logged. | All three hydrated records are logged. |
| S | `CreateShardSnapshotResponse` with a write landing between its document read and its sequence read (hooked in `GetCompactedThrough`). | The snapshot holds `[1]` at log sequence 2. The replica applies it and pulls, and still lacks 2: **divergence**. | Same. |
| C | Compact through 2, restart, then Put 3. | Note 3 is **minted sequence 1**, and `GetLatestMutationLogSequence` returns 1, below the floor of 2. | (not run; the code is unchanged) |
What the probes establish:
- A1, A2, S and C are pre-existing defects on main. Cut 4 inherits them and must not build on them: the
resync path it relies on for (a) is itself broken by S and C.
- On a replica, the pull loop already retries. The cursor advances only after an entry applies
(`CultNetDatabase.cs:1038-1083`), so a replica needs no new mechanism. It needs only to keep the exception
reaching that loop, which the branch's queue broke (A3).
- Loads on a primary must be logged, or replicas diverge (B1).
### (a) A journal that cannot log a committed change: one answer
The facts:
- The log store is a second durable store written after the cache's store. Without an atomic commit across
the two, the log can lag the store. It must never lead: a replica would then apply a change the primary
refused.
- So lag is unavoidable, and it has to be detectable and repaired.
- The protocol already has a repair, and nothing else needs to be invented.
- "History the primary cannot serve" is `compacted_history`: `CultNetDatabaseServer.cs:189-201` answers
`ResyncRequired`.
- `CultNetShardReplication.cs:199-214` then snapshot-resyncs.
**Rule: a primary that cannot log a committed change burns that change's sequence and compacts through it.**
- In the database journal, on a primary, for each change that is not `NoLog`:
1. Mint `S`.
2. Build the entry: the wire message from the door, or `ToLogEntryMessage`.
3. `Append` durably, **then** record it in memory. Disk goes first, so memory never serves what disk lacks.
- If step 2 or 3 throws:
- record nothing;
- raise the database's in-memory floor for the shard to `S`;
- try `store.CompactThrough(shard, S)`;
- still set `_lastWriteSequence` to `S`, because the row was written at `S`;
- carry on with the rest of the admission;
- throw `CultNetShardLogException` once at the end of the journal call (Q-P5 A).
- Every replica behind `S` is then told `compacted_history` and resyncs by snapshot. The sequence gap at `S`
is never served, because the floor covers it.
- This **replaces** the old §4 step 3 claim, "a serialization failure then mints nothing, so the log can never
hold a gap". Minting nothing hides a replication gap behind a dense sequence. That is exactly A2's silent
divergence.
- **Replica:** there is no floor. The journal's exception reaches `ApplyShardLogResponseAsync` and the cursor
does not advance. The next pull re-applies the entry: a fresh instance, so the door matches again, and the
entry is re-recorded under the primary's sequence. The branch's absent-key direct log follows the same
disk-first order.
- **Required fixes** that the rule depends on, all in Cut 4:
- `GetCompactedMutationLogSequence` (`CultNetDatabase.cs:597-602`) returns
`max(store floor, in-memory floor)`.
- `InitializeLogSequencesFromStore` (`:1363-1395`) resumes at
`max(highest retained, store.GetCompactedThrough(shard)) + 1`. This is probe C.
- `GetLatestMutationLogSequence` (`:607-616`) never reports below the floor.
- `CreateShardSnapshotResponse` (`:624-670`) reads `GetLatestMutationLogSequence` **before** `SelectAll`, on
both returns, `:645` and `:668`. The documents then reflect at least that sequence, and replaying later
entries converges: they are whole-document puts and deletes, applied in order. This is probe S.
- `RecordMutationLogEntry` (`:1331-1352`) writes disk first. The in-memory log becomes
`SortedList<long, entry>` per shard, replacing by sequence as the durable store does. This fixes A3's
duplicate.
- **Residual, recorded rather than forked.** Suppose the store refuses both `Append` and `CompactThrough`, and
then the process restarts.
- The durable log does not know about the hole, so A2's tail reuse can recur.
- Fixing that needs a durable write per mint, a sequence reservation, which doubles log I/O under the gate.
- The thrown exception names both failures, so the outage is loud.
- Refusing later writes ("fail closed") is not coherent. The database can refuse only its own doors, while
bare cache writes are journaled regardless: that would be split authority.
### (b) A pulled or loaded change on a primary: no origin needed
- On a primary the log is the shard's **state history**, whoever wrote the state. B1 shows that leaving loads
out of the log leaves replicas permanently diverged.
- The only origins that change what is logged are already carried by the door table, keyed by instance
identity and matched by shape. They are:
- `Replica` (log the primary's entry);
- `NoLog` (prediction, snapshot resync);
- `Put`/`Delete` (the wire message);
- `Predicts`/`Authoritative`.
- A load or pull has no door, so on a primary it is logged like any unattributed commit. On a replica it logs
nothing, like any local write. That is what the branch does, and B1 converges under it.
- Cost:
- B2: a store attached **after** the database logs its hydration.
- `CultNetHost` opens the cache before building the database (`CultNetLocal.cs:146-152`), so production
hydration is not journaled.
- A re-pull admits only the records that changed. In B1 the seed was not re-logged.
- `AddJournal` keeps its signature. If a future consumer (audit, say) needs "load or commit", the fact goes on
`CultCacheDocumentChange` as an additive property, as `Sequence` did. The cache already knows it: `Admit`'s
`source != null` at `CultCache.cs:2420`. It never needs a new `AddJournal` shape.
- This is recorded, not forked: no consumer needs it today.
### The two recorded hazards, settled for Cut 4
- **Q-P2 typed-exception hazard.** Cut 4 makes it frequent. Every cache write on a primary with a durable log
now does log I/O inside its admission.
- AetheriaEve opts into durable logs (`Aetheria.State/AetheriaStateNode.cs:144`).
- Its `AetheriaHangarCommandJournal.ValidateAsync` writes an envelope (`Program.cs:6509`) inside the `catch
(InvalidOperationException)` at `Program.cs:3722`.
- A log failure surfacing as `InvalidOperationException` would therefore produce a "denied" receipt for a
committed envelope.
- Q-P5 A (ruled): the writer gets a typed `CultNetShardLogException` that **does not derive from
`InvalidOperationException`**.
- **Journal deadlock (the Cut 3 note).** The database journal waits only on `_logGate` and on the log store's
own lock.
- Lock order: cache gate, then `_logGate`, then the log store's lock.
- Invariant: **no code holding `_logGate` calls the cache, and no log store calls the cache or waits on a
thread that does.**
- Readers that take `_logGate` read only log state: `GetMutationLog`, `LastWriteSequence`, `CurrentAsOf`.
Readers already inside a cache read, such as the selection evaluator's `ordinalOf`, nest `_logGate` under
the cache gate, which is the same order.
- The store rule goes into the `ICultNetShardMutationLogStore` XML doc (`CultNetShardMutationLogStorage.cs:13-34`),
because a user store runs under the cache's gate.
- A log store that writes the cache already throws, through Cut 3's guard. Cut 4 pins it with a test.
## Authority map
- **Owner.** `CultCache`. The hold that mints a Sequence range also:
@ -287,12 +420,9 @@ The database is rebuilt on the journal. It has no queue.
- Soul's P6 cannot happen: the prediction is recorded before
`PutPredictedAsync` returns.
3. Primacy.
- On a shard primary, where the door is not `NoLog` (prediction, snapshot):
build the log entry, including the wire message from a `Put`/`Delete`
door or `ToLogEntryMessage`, and **only then** mint the per-shard
sequence and append it to memory and to the durable store. A
serialization failure then mints nothing, so the log can never hold a
gap.
- On a shard primary, where the door is not `NoLog`: mint, build, append disk-first and record, with a failed
append burning the sequence and compacting through it. See "(a) A journal that cannot log a committed
change" in Imagination pass 4; the earlier claim that a serialization failure mints nothing is withdrawn.
- On a replica, record the primary's entry from the `Replica` door,
under its own sequence.
- For a local write on a replica, log nothing.
@ -485,96 +615,152 @@ They are the proof that no scheduler has come back.
### Cut 4. Salvage the branch and rebuild CultNetDatabase on the journal (networking)
- **4a (history).** `git merge origin/hands/cultnet-publish-commits` into the
cut branch. It is clean. The merge carries the tests; the queue dies in 4b.
Self may choose a squash-salvage instead, with the same content.
- **4b (subtraction, then behaviour).**
- **Deletes first**, at branch `28248eb` `CultNetDatabase.cs`:
- `_parked`, `_ready`, `_nextSequence` and `_draining` (`:502-505`);
- the handshake at `:530`;
- `OnCacheChange`'s queue body (`:1083-1135`);
- `PendingChange` (`:1265-1275`);
- `_predictionGate` and `HasPrediction` (`:506-507`, `:1209-1213`) and
their call sites (`:916`, `:1574`);
- the logging in `Deliver` (`:1168-1201`).
- **Moves.** Logging, predictions and door consumption move into the journal
(§4). `Deliver` becomes the publisher that reads the stash.
- **Changes.**
- Door flags: `Predicts` and `Authoritative`.
- The snapshot removal door sets `Removal`.
- The in-memory log becomes a `SortedList`.
- **Keeps.** Door identity and the shape rule, primacy, `_logGate` for
readers, and the absent-key delete's direct log.
- **4a (history).** `git merge origin/hands/cultnet-publish-commits` into the cut branch from main
`3bf1c0c`.
- It is clean: the probe merge `6ec2f73` auto-merged `NetworkingTests.cs` and the composition doc, then
built and ran.
- The merge brings the tests. The queue dies in 4b.
- Self may squash-salvage instead, with the same content.
- **4b (subtraction first).** Delete at branch `28248eb` `CultNetDatabase.cs`:
- `_parked`, `_ready`, `_nextSequence` and `_draining` (`:502-505`);
- `_predictionGate` (`:506-507`);
- the Watch subscription and handshake (`:529-531`);
- `OnCacheChange` (`:1080-1135`);
- `PendingChange` (`:1265-1275`);
- `HasPrediction` (`:1209-1213`) and its calls (`:916`, `:1574`);
- the logging and prediction bookkeeping in `Deliver` (`:1137-1201`).
Main's `PublishCacheUpdate` / `OnUpdate +=` (`:505`, `:1157`, `:1161-1191`) is already gone on the branch.
Hands confirms it is absent after the merge.
- **4c (the journal).** Register the Watch observer first and the journal second (`AddJournal`), in the
constructor. Per admission, under the cache gate, per change in Sequence order:
1. `TakeDoor(change)`, keeping the branch's shape rule (`:1219-1234`).
2. Resolve the shard and kind. Predictions: a `Predicts` door adds its key. An `Authoritative` door
(`ApplyPutAsync`, replica put) holding a prediction for the key makes the kind `Reconciled` and removes
the key.
3. Log, per §(a):
- a replica door records the primary's entry, disk first;
- a primary change that is not `NoLog` mints, builds, appends and records, with failure going to the
floor;
- anything else logs nothing.
4. Stash `(cache Sequence → CultNetDatabaseChange)` under `_logGate`.
5. If step 3 failed, throw once at the end of the call, after all changes are handled (Q-P5).
- **4c, publication.** The Watch observer removes the stash entry for `change.Sequence` and publishes it. A
missing stash means the change was admitted before this database existed, so it is ignored. `Dispose`
removes the journal and the observer and clears the stash.
- **4d (the §(a) fixes).**
- The floor: `GetCompactedMutationLogSequence`, `GetLatestMutationLogSequence`, and resume in
`InitializeLogSequencesFromStore`.
- Disk-first `RecordMutationLogEntry`.
- A `SortedList` per shard.
- The snapshot reads its sequence first (`:660` moves below `:668`'s read).
- `_logGate` around `_lastWriteSequence`/`_nextLogSequences` readers (`:1302`, `:1314`, `:1325`).
- **Door changes.**
- Flags: `Predicts` and `Authoritative`.
- The snapshot removal door (branch `:733`) sets `Removal = true`.
- The replica absent-key delete logs directly and publishes nothing (branch `:1612-1621`).
- Doors neither log nor publish. They register context, write the cache, and dispose the registration.
- **Verification.**
- Every salvaged test passes:
- `CultNetPublishesCommitsTests` (13);
- `CultNetPublicationOrderTests`: S1, S1b, S2, S3, S4, S6, S7,
log-before-publish, and in-place re-upsert.
- Soul's P1-P7 from `SoulPub3Tests.cs` are committed, all passing. P2 passes
because nothing orders delivery.
- Every salvaged test passes: `CultNetPublishesCommitsTests` (13) and `CultNetPublicationOrderTests` (S1,
S1b, S2, S3, S4, S6, S7, log-before-publish, in-place re-upsert).
- Soul pass 3's P1-P7 are committed and passing.
- The pass 4 probes become tests named for the rule:
- **A1:** a refused primary `Append` publishes the change. The writer gets `CultNetShardLogException`,
which names the shard and `S`. A replica pull answers `compacted_history`, and a snapshot resync
converges.
- **A2:** the same at the tail with a restart: the replica converges after resync, and no sequence is
reused. The store's `CompactThrough` succeeded.
- **A3:** a refused replica `Append` leaves the cursor unchanged. The retry converges, and the memory log
holds `[1,2]`.
- **B1:** a pull on a primary is logged, and the replica converges.
- **S:** a snapshot racing a write converges.
- **C:** after compacting through 2 and restarting, the next mint is 3.
- New tests:
- a reentrant `database.PutAsync` from inside a database handler is logged
with its context and published once;
- a reentrant `ApplyShardLogResponseAsync` from inside a handler keeps the
replica log in primary order;
- a primary serialization failure mints no log sequence.
- Commit latency with `CultNetFileShardMutationLogStore`, main against Cut 4.
It is reported, not gated.
- Negative grep: `rg -n "_parked|_ready|_draining|_nextSequence|_predictionGate|HasPrediction" src/GameCult.Networking`
- a reentrant `database.PutAsync` from inside a database handler is logged with its context and published
once;
- a reentrant `ApplyShardLogResponseAsync` from inside a handler keeps the replica log in primary order;
- a log store whose `Append` writes the cache fails with Cut 3's reentry guard, wrapped, and the admission
stands.
- Commit latency with `CultNetFileShardMutationLogStore`, main against Cut 4. Also measure a `CultMesh` node
with `EnableDurableShardLogs`, where every bookkeeping write is now logged. Report it; do not gate on it.
- Negative grep: `rg -n "_parked|_ready|_draining|_nextSequence|_predictionGate|HasPrediction|PublishCacheUpdate" src/GameCult.Networking`
returns nothing.
- Review check: no `_cache.` call inside a `lock (_logGate)` block.
- The `4562340` tests stay green.
- Stryker on the diff.
- **Ledger.** Against the branch, about −120 and +60.
- Test runs use `--blame-hang-timeout 2m`.
- Stryker on the diff: dropping the floor raise, memory-before-disk, and the snapshot read order must each
kill a test.
- **Docs.**
- Composition doc `:50-53`: replace the "streams derive from `OnUpdate`" sentence. CultNet derives from
`Watch` plus one journal, and the log is written in cache order.
- A new paragraph: a primary that cannot log a change compacts through it.
- The log-store rule under Locking.
- **Blockers.** None. Q-P5 is ruled A.
- **Ledger.** Against the branch, about −130 and +95. The extra over the old estimate is the floor, the
disk-first order, the `SortedList`, the snapshot order, and the exception type.
### Cut 5. Database fan-out isolation and Sequence (networking, behaviour)
- **Deletes first.** The database's `Subject<object> _changes` (main `:487`).
- **Deletes first.** The database's `Subject<object> _changes` (main `:485`, branch `:487`) and its
`Dispose` (`:1158`).
- **Adds.**
- The isolated observer array.
- `CultNetDatabaseChange<T>.Sequence` (main `:319-371`), set by the journal.
- The isolated observer array, the same pattern as the cache's `Register`/`Publish`
(`CultCache.cs:1929-1944`, `:2470-2503`), behind `Watch<T>`, `WatchAllChanges` and the rest (`:1089-1145`).
- `CultNetDatabaseChange<T>.Sequence` (`:319-371`), as an optional constructor argument. The journal's stash
sets it from the cache change. A change with no cache change behind it carries 0.
- **Docs.** The binary-signature note, as the composition doc gave for `CultCacheDocumentChange` (`:57-58`).
- **Verification.**
- With a rethrowing handler and one throwing database subscriber, the other
subscriber and a live subscription-server peer receive every change.
- With a rethrowing handler and one throwing database subscriber, the other subscriber and a live
subscription-server peer receive every change. The writer gets the exception after delivery (Q-P2).
- The disposed-database test.
- `Sequence` equals the cache change's.
- **Ledger.** About −10 and +30.
- **Blockers.** Cut 4.
- **Ledger.** About −10 and +35.
### Cut 6. Stale protection on wire projections (networking, behaviour)
### Cut 6. Stale protection on wire projections (networking, behaviour; Q-P4 A)
This is a separate cut that closes a pre-existing hole. Composition doc
`:50-53` says the CultNet streams "have no ordering guarantee and no stale
protection", and the branch's total order was reaching for this.
- **The rule.** A projection applies a change to a key only if its `Sequence` is above what the projection
last applied for that key. A snapshot or reconcile applies everything at or below the cache sequence it read
**before** reading documents.
- That read is `Cache.GetWithSequence(<any key>).Sequence`, the branch's idiom (branch `:531`). No new API
is needed.
- **Subscription server** (`CultNetDatabaseSubscriptionServer.cs`):
- `SubscriptionProjectionState` (`:630`) gains `long Floor` and `Dictionary<string, long> Applied`.
- The single-row fast path in `Watch` (`:296-340`) reads the change's `Sequence` (reflection, like `Key`).
Under `_lifecycleGate` it drops the change if `Sequence <= max(Floor, Applied[key])`. Otherwise it applies
the change and records it. Removals are included.
- `Reconcile` (`:347`) and the subscribe snapshot (`:168-181`) read `seq0` before `CreateProjectedSnapshot`
(`:402`), set `Floor = seq0`, and clear `Applied`.
- This is sound: every change applied earlier was applied under the same gate, after its admission, so
its `Sequence` is at most `seq0`.
- Hop and unauthorized paths already reconcile from current state, and they set the floor too.
- **`CultNetDatabaseServer.CreateSubscription`** (`:501-513`):
- A per-subscription `(Floor, Applied)` under a per-subscription lock, held across check, record and send.
- `HandleSubscribeAsync`'s snapshot (`:362-369`) takes `seq0` first and sets the floor.
- **Verification.**
- Two threads write one key, with a blocking cache observer that forces the inverted delivery (Q3 shape).
On both servers, the peer's last state for the key equals the cache's.
- A removal overtaken by an older upsert leaves the key absent at the peer.
- The negative check: without the drop, both tests fail.
- **Blockers.** Cut 5, which provides `Sequence` on database changes.
- **Ledger.** About +45.
- **The rule.** A projection sends a record only if the change's `Sequence` is
above the Sequence it last applied for that key.
- The subscription server applies it under `_lifecycleGate`, keyed in
`SubscriptionProjectionState` next to `DeliveredBySourceRecordKey`
(`CultNetDatabaseSubscriptionServer.cs:446`).
- `CultNetDatabaseServer.CreateSubscription` (`:501-512`) applies it under a
per-subscription lock.
- `Reconcile` (`:347`) stamps each key it reads with a per-key atomic
`GetWithSequence`.
- **Verification.** Two threads write one key with a blocking observer that
forces the inverted delivery (Q3 shape). The peer's last state for the key
equals the cache's, on both servers.
- **Operator.** Q-P4 asks whether this cut belongs here or is recorded.
- **Ledger.** About +40.
### Salvage from `hands/cultnet-publish-commits`
### Salvage from `hands/cultnet-publish-commits` (revised)
- **Keep:**
- both new test files;
- the `NetworkingTests.cs` edits (`:1528`, `:2257`);
- the door-shape rule;
- both test files;
- the `NetworkingTests.cs` edits;
- the door table and the shape rule;
- "replicas never mint";
- log-before-publish;
- "the snapshot logs nothing";
- the rewritten composition-doc paragraph, rewritten again by Cut 3 to name
the journal as the log's order source.
- **Commit** Soul pass 3's P1-P7: P3 in Cut 2, P4 in Cut 1, and the rest in
Cut 4.
- **Drop:** the reorder buffer, the drainer, `_predictionGate`, and logging
from the observer.
- "loads and pulls on a primary are logged" (B1);
- the composition-doc paragraph, rewritten to name the journal.
- **Drop:**
- the reorder buffer and the drainer;
- `_predictionGate`;
- logging from the observer;
- the swallowed exception path (A1 and A3 on the branch).
## Subtraction ledger (estimate)
@ -583,66 +769,28 @@ protection", and the branch's total order was reaching for this.
| 1 | ~15 | ~45 | none |
| 2 | ~5 | ~30 | the cache no longer uses R3 `Subject` |
| 3 | 0 | ~50 | one public method (Q-P3) |
| 4 | ~120 vs branch | ~60 | the merge brings +1109/−243, of which about 780 are tests |
| 5 | ~10 | ~30 | the database `Subject` goes, and one public property |
| 6 | 0 | ~40 | none |
| 4 | ~130 vs branch | ~95 | the merge brings +1109/-243, of which about 780 are tests; the floor, disk-first order, `SortedList`, snapshot order and `CultNetShardLogException` are the extra over the first estimate |
| 5 | ~10 | ~35 | the database `Subject` goes, and one public property |
| 6 | 0 | ~45 | none |
- **Source, net against main:** about +200.
- **Source against the branch:** about −60, and no scheduler anywhere.
- **Source, net against main:** about +245.
- **Source against the branch:** no scheduler anywhere.
- The budget is pressure, not a metric.
## Operator questions
- **Q-P1. Order.**
- **A. Order as data** (the `4562340` ruling, kept).
- Every change is published exactly once, on its writer's thread, before
the write returns, and carries `Sequence`.
- There is no cross-thread delivery order.
- The shard log is in cache order because the journal writes it under the
gate.
- Wire projections drop stale changes by Sequence (Cut 6).
- **B. Totally ordered delivery in the cache** (a turnstile, which is Soul's
stated direction). It was built as `bcae483`, deleted for deadlock as
`4562340`, and reproduced by this pass: the networking suite hangs.
Making it safe needs a rule that nobody holding a lock an observer takes
may write the cache, and the subscription server itself breaks that rule.
- **C. A dedicated delivery thread or drainer** (the branch). It was refuted
by Soul pass 3: F3 and F4.
- **Recommended: A.** Only A delivers exactly-once, before-return and
no-deadlock together. The one consumer that needs order gets it where order
is decided.
- **Q-P2. An observer whose exception escapes** (a fail-fast R3 handler, or a
custom observer).
- **A.** Rethrow it to the writer after every observer has run, and keep the
observer subscribed.
- **B.** Report it and unsubscribe.
- **C.** Route it to R3's unhandled handler only.
- **Recommended: A.**
- It matches the `OnUpdate` policy and R3's `OnErrorResume`.
- An escape only happens when the owner asked for fail-fast.
- B turns one bad change into permanent deafness.
- C sends the exception back to the handler that just rethrew it.
- The commit stands under every option.
- **Q-P3. The journal's surface.**
- **A.** A public `IDisposable CultCache.AddJournal(Action<IReadOnlyList<CultCacheDocumentChange<object>>>)`,
guarded so that entering the cache from it throws.
- **B.** An internal method, with `InternalsVisibleTo("GameCult.Networking")`.
The comment at `CultCache.cs:214` shows Networking was deliberately kept
without it.
- **Recommended: A.**
- The contract is small, and the dangerous misuse, reentry, is enforced
rather than documented.
- An ordered admission journal is a legitimate library capability: audit,
replication and derived indexes.
- B couples two assemblies to hide one method.
- **Q-P4. Cut 6 now or later?**
- **A.** Land it in this campaign.
- **B.** Record it.
- **Recommended: A.** With every commit now published, two writers of one key
on two threads can leave a peer holding the older state. That was already
true for loads; commits make it common.
- Q-P1..Q-P4 are ruled (see Rulings). Their option analysis is in the map's git history.
Not forks, recorded so they are not re-asked:
- **Q-P5 A (ruled 2026-09-29): a primary that cannot log a committed change throws a typed
`CultNetShardLogException` naming the shard and the burned sequence, after publication, not derived from
`InvalidOperationException`.**
- The commit stands, the change is published, and replicas behind it snapshot-resync (Imagination pass 4 (a)).
- The writer hears of it. AetheriaEve `Program.cs:3722` cannot mistake it for a denial.
Recorded, not forked:
- (b): no origin on the journal. Loads and pulls are logged on primaries.
- (a)'s restart residual when the store refuses both writes.
- The replica keeps retry-by-cursor.
- A throwing getter refuses loads too.
- Reentrant writes keep main's depth-first delivery. Order is data.
- Journal I/O under the gate follows the store precedent.
@ -651,8 +799,6 @@ Not forks, recorded so they are not re-asked:
- **`cultmesh-py` watch.** It has no isolation and no Sequence
(`node.py:1059-1065`).
- **`RecordMutationLogEntry` memory-before-disk.** A throwing durable `Append`
leaves memory ahead of disk. This predates the campaign.
- **Durable log whole-file rewrite.** `CultNetShardMutationLogStorage.cs:83-89`
rewrites the whole file per `Append`. It is a monolith, and under the gate
its cost is now every writer's.
@ -662,3 +808,9 @@ Not forks, recorded so they are not re-asked:
serialized delivery was built, deadlocked, and was deleted". The Soul pass 3
direction re-proposed it anyway. The Soul brief template should tell Soul to
check `git log -S` for a proposed mechanism before recommending it.
- **A chained replica after a snapshot.** A replica that snapshot-resyncs has no log entries below the snapshot
sequence. It should raise its own floor to that sequence, so a replica chained on it resyncs instead of seeing
a gap (`ApplyShardSnapshotResponseAsync` `:675-736`). It predates this campaign.
- **AetheriaEve `Program.cs:3722`.** It reads a committed write's `InvalidOperationException` as a denial. Under
Q-P5 A, Cut 4's log failures cannot reach it. Observer and `OnUpdate` exceptions still can, so the Cuts 1-2
recording stands.