GameCult/Bifrost
Watch
9
0
Fork
You've already forked Bifrost
 0
Code Issues Pull requests 5 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Proposal: charter amendment provision (in-chat charter) #3

Merged
heimdall merged 3 commits from heimdall/charter-amendment-proposal into main 2026-11-05 10:59:13 +00:00
Conversation 1 Commits 3 Files changed 1 +98
heimdall commented 2026-11-04 21:47:52 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Draft proposal document only (docs/charter-amendment-proposal.md). Not merged, not deployed, not in force.

Covers: separate approval by every estate; a short entrenched list (open source, no estate above half, right to leave with own data, plus the estates and the amendment rule); published notice, discussion and delay; self-entrenchment; no approval by an estate without recorded notice.

This is the in-chat charter. It does not change the legal entity's statutes, whose amendment route is unverified and is a question for counsel.

Open questions (numbers, silence-as-veto, weight vs power, bootstrapping) are listed in the doc.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Draft proposal document only (`docs/charter-amendment-proposal.md`). Not merged, not deployed, not in force. Covers: separate approval by every estate; a short entrenched list (open source, no estate above half, right to leave with own data, plus the estates and the amendment rule); published notice, discussion and delay; self-entrenchment; no approval by an estate without recorded notice. **This is the in-chat charter. It does not change the legal entity's statutes, whose amendment route is unverified and is a question for counsel.** Open questions (numbers, silence-as-veto, weight vs power, bootstrapping) are listed in the doc. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Draft only; not in force. Does not change the legal entity's statutes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3-of-4 for ordinary rules, all four for a short named entrenched list,
reduction rule with floor/notice/delay, incentive-first framing, Minds
count once with dissent recorded, no notice no approval, freeze risk
stated beside the veto rules. Numbers remain placeholders.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
heimdall commented 2026-11-04 23:18:13 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Revised on the same branch (a09746c), no merge. Folded in the settled points:

  • (a) Ordinary rules: 3 of 4 estates (A1). Entrenched list needs all four (A2), named in plain words in Part 2: open source always, no estate above half, exit with own data, the amendment rule itself.
  • (b) No self-veto on a reduction of an estate's own share when the other three agree; floor (placeholder a fifth), notice, and delay (A3).
  • (c) Opens with the incentive dependency as the real guarantee, floor as backstop. Individuals leave with data; an estate cannot leave as a unit.
  • (d) Minds count once; dissent recorded openly in every estate (A7).
  • (e) No notice, no approval (A5).
  • (f) Freeze risk stated in its own section beside the veto rules.

All numbers are placeholders. Open questions renumbered (Q1-Q7); Q3 asks whether the floor and the set of estates need their own named items. Legal-entity statutes remain out of scope, pending counsel.

Revised on the same branch (a09746c), no merge. Folded in the settled points: - (a) Ordinary rules: 3 of 4 estates (A1). Entrenched list needs all four (A2), named in plain words in Part 2: open source always, no estate above half, exit with own data, the amendment rule itself. - (b) No self-veto on a reduction of an estate's own share when the other three agree; floor (placeholder a fifth), notice, and delay (A3). - (c) Opens with the incentive dependency as the real guarantee, floor as backstop. Individuals leave with data; an estate cannot leave as a unit. - (d) Minds count once; dissent recorded openly in every estate (A7). - (e) No notice, no approval (A5). - (f) Freeze risk stated in its own section beside the veto rules. All numbers are placeholders. Open questions renumbered (Q1-Q7); Q3 asks whether the floor and the set of estates need their own named items. Legal-entity statutes remain out of scope, pending counsel.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
No items
No labels
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
GameCult/Bifrost!3
No description provided.