Gate song curriculum on producer evidence
This commit is contained in:
parent
378d8e1fb3
commit
5cf8f0da23
5 changed files with 384 additions and 58 deletions
|
|
@ -366,6 +366,15 @@ banks through `layer`, `harmonics`, and `spectrum`. Simple oscillator blips
|
|||
without one of these owners are chip-distress-risk contrast material, not a
|
||||
strong lesson for the music generator.
|
||||
|
||||
Song-scene curriculum admission is producer apprenticeship, not syntax
|
||||
attendance. A candidate that names `meter`, `sequence`, `kick`, `hat`, or
|
||||
`texture` has not learned music until it leaves a producer brief, listening
|
||||
journal, Aqua gap ledger, and compact studio lesson tying those choices to the
|
||||
reference. Distillation should promote only rendered candidates with audible
|
||||
form, target-specific roles, and low template/noise-percussion risk. Stock
|
||||
four-lane loops and raw noise percussion belong in failure documents even when
|
||||
they keep RMS and motion metrics nonzero.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not confuse high metric agreement with musical success. The game context,
|
||||
the reference sound, and the user’s ear still outrank the spreadsheet. Annoying,
|
||||
but civilization has survived worse.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue